chore: fix some minor issues in the comment

Signed-off-by: deepdring <[email protected]>

Author: deepdring

chia/_tests/environments/wallet.py

@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ async def process_pending_states(
         1) Ensures all pending transactions have entered the mempool
         2) Checks that all balances have changed properly prior to a block being farmed
         3) Farms a block (to no one in particular)
-        4) Chacks that all balances have changed properly after the block was farmed
+        4) Checks that all balances have changed properly after the block was farmed
         5) Checks that all pending transactions that were gathered in step 1 are now confirmed
         6) Checks that if `reuse_puzhash` was set, no new derivations were created
         7) Ensures the wallet is in a synced state before progressing to the rest of the test

chia/_tests/wallet/test_wallet_node.py

@@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ async def test_transaction_send_cache(
 ) -> None:
     """
     The purpose of this test is to test that calling _resend_queue on the wallet node does not result in resending a
-    spend to a peer that has already recieved that spend and is currently processing it. It also tests that once we
+    spend to a peer that has already received that spend and is currently processing it. It also tests that once we
     have heard that the peer is done processing the spend, we _do_ properly resend it.
     """
     [full_node_api], [(wallet_node, wallet_server)], _ = simulator_and_wallet
@@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ def logged_spends_len() -> int:
         with pytest.raises(AssertionError):
             await time_out_assert(5, logged_spends_len, 2)
 
-        # Tell the wallet that we recieved the spend (but failed to process it so it should send again)
+        # Tell the wallet that we received the spend (but failed to process it so it should send again)
         msg = make_msg(
             ProtocolMessageTypes.transaction_ack,
             wallet_protocol.TransactionAck(

chia/wallet/conditions.py

@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ def from_mode_and_maybe_args(
         amount_committed: Optional[uint64] = None
         # This loop probably looks a little strange
         # It's trying to account for the fact that the arguments may be any 1 or 2 of these arguments in this order
-        # Not sure of a more elgant way to do it
+        # Not sure of a more elegant way to do it
         original_mode = mode
         for arg in args:
             if mode & 0b100: