Replies: 9 comments 39 replies
-
Yep, same happening here. I've only noticed it today, but could have been happening for a few days, I fear. And I am running mine on Raspberry Pi OS, on a Pi 4 with 8GB RAM which I bought specifically for this... :-( Full Node, firewall ports open and correctly forwarded, ~50 nodes connected and up-to-date. Has to be the efficiency of the daemon taxing the Pi, I also believe: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have exactly the same problem. I described it here #5223 I had my node running well on a desktop, and just moved everything to a Pi (including the synced blockchain db) and cannot be in sync anymore. Plus getting a very strange readout from the debug.log file.... please help! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Same setup, although running with Raspbian OS 64 and booting from an external SSD. It just cannot keep up and loses connection. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
That`s disappointing to hear. So I am having the same issue on another system I built. Running on my Synology NAS I am running Windows Server Core with 3GB ram (40% usage), 3 core (6 threads) 1.5GHz Celeron, CPU normally running around 75% usage and It can`t keep up. I really want to know what specs of hardware you need to run this on. I feel the single core speed makes the difference. I am running another test to see if my Windows 10 Desktop VM with 4GB and 3 core (6 Threads) 3.6Ghz can keep up |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Update: EDIT: only one core is at 100% |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Disable uPNP - it is not a requirement. It will sync fine without it, with
fewer peers. I have 4 machines on the same network, all synching fine. Only
one has port-forwarding configured.
…On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 16:31, KaKa ***@***.***> wrote:
If both VM is on the same network (same outbound IP), it will have
collision of uPnP getting the port 8444.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4769 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABNWZHVDRENGYBWGUAAYSLTTOPKVZANCNFSM44Z2SWWQ>
.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have the same sync problems with my raspberry pi 4 (4gb) as you guys. Has anyone tried the new version of Chia (1.1.6) and a Rasperberry Pi yet? Sync should be better with this version. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I don't know what fixed it but I did a complete reinstall with 1.1.6. I reimaged the sdcard and reinstall ubuntu and set everything up again. This included download a new version of the block chain instead of coping it from an different source. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@OptimAdam , based on your previous message it seems this issue has been resolved. The best place to reach our support team is on Discord (https://discord.gg/chia) or by reopening this ticket. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
Is anyone running the full node on a Raspberry pi 4?
It was running ok for me for a while, but recently its really struggling to keep up with the block chain and it is always falling out of sync. It would be good to know if anyone else is experiencing this or still using a pi.
I am thinking the chain is now to big for the Pi to process Quite often I see the Full node process running at 100% CPU.
Pi is running Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions