You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If a pool would become dominating, would it start to dominate the rewards more than the space share? Consider all the internal transactions taken place within the pool that will have to be mounted on the blockchain, it might become faster than other peers outside the pool to get the validation, especially with a fast timelord within the pool? Say if someone tries to generate a lot of transactions with a fast timelord on a same local network, he would have the shortest time to get his pool plots validated, basically virtually zero delay? Not sure if any solo farmers are still getting their share of the rewards these days statistically. It seems that the probability of getting rewards is getting to zero too fast. Basically, how the blockchain would ensure equal probability of winning not depending on the network response speed? Although there is the 5sec and 30sec rule, but would say the farmer with 2 sec delay could lose the reward to someone who has 1 sec delay as an example? Say both are trying to validate, but the one with shorter delay already got in early, leading to the famous DOUBLE_SPENDING error for the late comer?
Would this also explain why the network is still growing exponentially (there must be an incentive for this to happen) even though it seems that it no longer make sense to make new plots for solo farmers?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
If a pool would become dominating, would it start to dominate the rewards more than the space share? Consider all the internal transactions taken place within the pool that will have to be mounted on the blockchain, it might become faster than other peers outside the pool to get the validation, especially with a fast timelord within the pool? Say if someone tries to generate a lot of transactions with a fast timelord on a same local network, he would have the shortest time to get his pool plots validated, basically virtually zero delay? Not sure if any solo farmers are still getting their share of the rewards these days statistically. It seems that the probability of getting rewards is getting to zero too fast. Basically, how the blockchain would ensure equal probability of winning not depending on the network response speed? Although there is the 5sec and 30sec rule, but would say the farmer with 2 sec delay could lose the reward to someone who has 1 sec delay as an example? Say both are trying to validate, but the one with shorter delay already got in early, leading to the famous DOUBLE_SPENDING error for the late comer?
Would this also explain why the network is still growing exponentially (there must be an incentive for this to happen) even though it seems that it no longer make sense to make new plots for solo farmers?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions