tweaks

Author: kschlarman

docs/integrations/data-ingestion/clickpipes/kafka/04_best_practices.md

@@ -137,11 +137,11 @@ Below are some informal benchmarks for ClickPipes for Kafka that can be used get
 
 Benchmark details:
 - We used production ClickHouse Cloud services with enough resources to ensure that throughput was not bottlenecked by the insert processing on the ClickHouse side.
-- The ClickHouse Cloud service, the Kafka cluster (Confluent Cloud), and the ClickPipe were all running in the same region (us-east-2).
-- The ClickPipe was configured with a single consumer.
+- The ClickHouse Cloud service, the Kafka cluster (Confluent Cloud), and the ClickPipe were all running in the same region (`us-east-2`).
+- The ClickPipe was configured with a single replica.
 - The sample data included nested data with a mix of uuid, string, and integer datatypes.
   - Other datatypes, such as floats may be less performant.
-- There was no appreciable differene in performance between compressed and uncompressed data.
+- There was no appreciable difference in performance between compressed and uncompressed data.
 
 
 | Replica Size | Message Size | Data Format | Throughput |