You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm converting a legacy codebase to communitytoolkit and am currently facing a few instances where the getter of a proeprty I seek to replace has custom logic (e.g. a fallback value in case the backing field is an empty string). The generated code fia a partial property is get => field; would it be possible to define the getter in the user code instead?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'm converting a legacy codebase to communitytoolkit and am currently facing a few instances where the getter of a proeprty I seek to replace has custom logic (e.g. a fallback value in case the backing field is an empty string). The generated code fia a partial property is
get => field;would it be possible to define the getter in the user code instead?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions