merging PCF changes into this fork

Author: jeremymanning

paper/changes.pdf

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 \documentclass[10pt]{article}
 %DIF LATEXDIFF DIFFERENCE FILE
 %DIF DEL old.tex    Mon Feb 19 07:49:49 2024
-%DIF ADD main.tex   Thu Feb 22 00:08:08 2024
+%DIF ADD main.tex   Thu Feb 22 00:13:45 2024
 %DIF 2a2
 \usepackage{amsmath} %DIF > 
 %DIF -------
@@ -837,8 +837,8 @@ \section*{Results}
 general, or about Quiz~1 performance in particular. This would be expected, for
 example, if participants were guessing about the answers to the Quiz~1
 questions (prior to having watched either lecture). When we repeated this
-analysis for Quizzes~2 and~3, we found that }\textit{\DIFadd{higher}} \DIFadd{estimated knowledge
-for a given question predicted a greater likelihood of answering it correctly
+analysis for Quizzes~2 and~3, we found that higher estimated knowledge
+for a given question predicted a }\textit{\DIFadd{greater}} \DIFadd{likelihood of answering it correctly
 (Quiz~2: $OR = 2.905,\ \lambda_{LR} = 17.333,\ 95\%\ \textnormal{CI} =
 [14.966,\ 29.309],\ p = 0.001$; Quiz~3: $OR = 3.238,\ \lambda_{LR} = 6.882,\
 95\%\ \textnormal{CI} = [6.228,\ 8.184],\ p = 0.016$). Taken together, these

paper/changes.tex

@@ -665,8 +665,8 @@ \section*{Results}
 general, or about Quiz~1 performance in particular. This would be expected, for
 example, if participants were guessing about the answers to the Quiz~1
 questions (prior to having watched either lecture). When we repeated this
-analysis for Quizzes~2 and~3, we found that \textit{higher} estimated knowledge
-for a given question predicted a greater likelihood of answering it correctly
+analysis for Quizzes~2 and~3, we found that higher estimated knowledge
+for a given question predicted a \textit{greater} likelihood of answering it correctly
 (Quiz~2: $OR = 2.905,\ \lambda_{LR} = 17.333,\ 95\%\ \textnormal{CI} =
 [14.966,\ 29.309],\ p = 0.001$; Quiz~3: $OR = 3.238,\ \lambda_{LR} = 6.882,\
 95\%\ \textnormal{CI} = [6.228,\ 8.184],\ p = 0.016$). Taken together, these