Skip to content

Conversation

arianber7
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@csm-thu csm-thu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requested some changes 🙂
By the way, the unit tests in the repo are broken on your branch (you can run them by launching yarn test)

Also, do you think it would be possible to split your work on this ticket in two commits? One for the columns metadata not being built on every iteration of the loop, and another commit for the change or tweak of date parsing function. This way, if we don't find a better mechanism for the second part, the first part remains ready to be used (it also has less risks to break something ^^)

Copy link
Contributor

@nborde-CSM nborde-CSM left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A little typo on the commit message : imporve instead of improve

Some remarks but in overall LGTM 👍

@arianber7 arianber7 changed the title perf: [10196] imporve perfromance of CSV parsing table perf: [10196] improve perfromance of CSV parsing table Oct 15, 2025
@arianber7 arianber7 force-pushed the abe/Improve-perfs-of-CSV-parsing-for-Table-components-PROD-10196 branch 3 times, most recently from 7c237e0 to 8f3435c Compare October 15, 2025 09:27
@arianber7 arianber7 force-pushed the abe/Improve-perfs-of-CSV-parsing-for-Table-components-PROD-10196 branch from 8f3435c to 630ca95 Compare October 15, 2025 09:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants