Replies: 1 comment
-
|
I definitely agree with the denoise suggestion: What I am currently most struggeling with from a UX / workflow perspective is denoising. I am sure there is a reason for the current implementation. However, I would expect to see denoising in the detail module/section and also not requiring to work with a separate file but non-destructive directly with the raw file. And, while keeping it simple, still with a separation into luminance and chrominance denoising. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi!
These are all simply suggestions / ideas. None of this has to be executed or added. I just thought I'd give feedback on things I wish / would like to see after playing with the tool for about 2 hours now across different settings and scenarios. Maybe some of these ideas give new insights, maybe I just list things that have been said hundreds of times and add to the voices, making the priorities higher of what is said. In any way, thanks for the great tool and can't wait to follow the next updates!
Multiple UI adjustments:
Again, I know this probably repeats a lot of what is otherwise already said, but I thought I'd write it down and put it here before I forget to post it again or something.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions