Stealthy fetcher mode triggers unwanted ad/analytics requests impacting proxy usage #128
Unanswered
rubiagul280
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
|
Hi mate, is playing around with |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
-
|
Use request interception in tools like Puppeteer or Playwright to whitelist only the target domain and abort anything matching ad/analytics patterns (e.g., Google Analytics, DoubleClick). You can also add proxy-side rules (like in mitmproxy) to block known tracker domains so only first-party traffic goes through and your proxy usage stays clean. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
When loading a page in stealthy fetcher mode, the request unexpectedly triggers dozens of additional calls to ad networks, analytics trackers, and third‑party resources.
Even after disabling resource loading, these ad/analytics requests still occur and inflate proxy usage—sometimes 80–100 extra requests for what should be a single page fetch. This makes proxy bandwidth consumption and request counts much higher than expected.
Question:
How can we effectively block or filter these unwanted third‑party requests so that only the main domain traffic is counted and proxied? Are there recommended approaches (e.g., request interception, domain whitelisting, or proxy‑side filtering) to ensure stealthy fetcher mode doesn’t include ads/analytics calls?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions