[BOLT] Fix thread-safety of MarkRAStates (llvm#165368)

The pass calls setIgnored() on functions in parallel, but setIgnored is
not thread safe. This patch adds a std::mutex to guard setIgnored calls.

Fixes: llvm#165362

Author: bgergely0

bolt/include/bolt/Passes/MarkRAStates.h

@@ -13,11 +13,16 @@
 #define BOLT_PASSES_MARK_RA_STATES
 
 #include "bolt/Passes/BinaryPasses.h"
+#include <mutex>
 
 namespace llvm {
 namespace bolt {
 
 class MarkRAStates : public BinaryFunctionPass {
+  // setIgnored() is not thread-safe, but the pass is running on functions in
+  // parallel.
+  std::mutex IgnoreMutex;
+
 public:
   explicit MarkRAStates() : BinaryFunctionPass(false) {}
 

bolt/lib/Passes/MarkRAStates.cpp

@@ -43,10 +43,11 @@ bool MarkRAStates::runOnFunction(BinaryFunction &BF) {
         // Not all functions have .cfi_negate_ra_state in them. But if one does,
         // we expect psign/pauth instructions to have the hasNegateRAState
         // annotation.
-        BF.setIgnored();
         BC.outs() << "BOLT-INFO: inconsistent RAStates in function "
                   << BF.getPrintName()
                   << ": ptr sign/auth inst without .cfi_negate_ra_state\n";
+        std::lock_guard<std::mutex> Lock(IgnoreMutex);
+        BF.setIgnored();
         return false;
       }
     }
@@ -67,6 +68,7 @@ bool MarkRAStates::runOnFunction(BinaryFunction &BF) {
           BC.outs() << "BOLT-INFO: inconsistent RAStates in function "
                     << BF.getPrintName()
                     << ": ptr signing inst encountered in Signed RA state\n";
+          std::lock_guard<std::mutex> Lock(IgnoreMutex);
           BF.setIgnored();
           return false;
         }
@@ -80,6 +82,7 @@ bool MarkRAStates::runOnFunction(BinaryFunction &BF) {
                     << BF.getPrintName()
                     << ": ptr authenticating inst encountered in Unsigned RA "
                        "state\n";
+          std::lock_guard<std::mutex> Lock(IgnoreMutex);
           BF.setIgnored();
           return false;
         }