Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
@IgorPelevanyuk and @adriansev As you seem to be using COMDIRAC, do you have any opinion on this ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Hi! Not really, my use-case for dinit was just |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Implemented in: #6961 (will go in v8.1 onwards) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
This is mainly a question for @atsareg initially...
As part of the COMDIRAC v8r1 cleanup we've been asked to remove dinit if possible... The current workflow for a COMDIRAC as I understand it is:
dinit <profile_name>
, profile_name is usually the DIRAC group, but doesn't have to be.Our suggested new workflow is:
dirac-proxy-init -g <dirac_group>
to get a proxy, no immediate session initialisation happens.We would probably also remove all references to DCOMMANDS_PPID environment variable as it isn't clear to me that anyone is using that now: It isn't set in any of the current bashrc/diracosrc init files any more, so all of the commands fall back to just auto-detecting the PPID.
This would mean that there would no longer be any custom profiles: You'd have one profile per DIRAC group that you use. Does that sound reasonable to you?
Regards,
Simon
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions