🪱🕳🐫 Wormhole solution for strategy swapping multimodal

[hyunjimoon]

Camel's back is multimodal but there exists a higher dimension where this camel can be blown into a connected and compact object.

Resource allocation in different balance loops to close the performance gap necessarily creates multimodal posterior geometry. In specific, the two balance loops should have different effectiveness and delays like work smarter and harder loops.

To overcome death valley from temporal complexity during strategy migration, finding additional parameter that makes this transition smooth is essential. i.e. by adding a parameter, bimodality disappears, making crossing (or even periodic alternation) from one to the other strategy easier. This could be seen as unclamping the scale parameter on the effect of this specific structure from tight mean zero to larger mean (and sd). $\sigma_{loop_a} \sim 0 \rightarrow half-normal(1,.1)$

[hyunjimoon]

Multimodality as a heterogenous combination of homogenous units VS a homogenous combination of heterogeneous units may be the fundamental question to answer. I wonder what interpretation this may have in strategy space. The following first hole (Latent variables don’t always exist (quantum physics)) from Andrew's Holes in Bayesian statistics.

As long as we do not confuse additivity of elements in the vector space (i.e. |1 + |2 is also a feasible outcome as long as |1 and |2 are) with additivity of disjoint events under probability measures (i.e. Pr(x = 1 or x = 2) = Pr(x = 1) + Pr(x = 2)), the quantum phenomenon is simply {x = 1 or x = 2} ={x = |1 + |2}, which is not surprising either probabilistically or physically

[hyunjimoon]

Another example of flexible consistency manifested as multimodality:
Koreans are willing to change their order (menu) in a restaurant depending on their colleague's order. From low consistency in our manifested actions, some western scholars interpreted this as a lack of individualism. However, in fact, this may be even stronger version of individualism as Koreans' adjustment is done voluntarily, without any sacrificing tint, which is only possible when each member completed the calculation of a dynamically redefined payoff as a mixture of local-global payoff and the relational term within.

---

• I admit the minute difference between voluntary and blind conformity. Perhaps many instances of social revolution against the ruling party in Korea may be one counter-example of Koreans conform blindly.

• in the first Asian studies, it would be hard to have a high enough resolution to differentiate Japanese and Korean -- Japanese has more group-centered philosophies from their historic and geological reasons detailed here)