Top ten trolls #121
Replies: 4 comments 4 replies
-
Hypothesis:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I wish to dig deeper into the phenomenon of installing a soft barrier on zero using inverse parameterization. Zero-avoiding in normal(2, 2 * .1) is equivalent to infinite-avoiding in normal(1/2, 1/2 *.1) (hyperbolic geometry has a similar spirit) is the key. Could we find an analogy in econ or policy where inverse parameterization regulation is more effective or efficient or satisfactory? Instead of regulating based on current wealth, expertise, and popularity classification, what if we regulate based on 1/wealth, 1/expertise, 1/populatin? Would tax system become more effective or fairer, making extreme more extreme? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
speed distribution for 180, 240, 240, 540, 540, 240, 13,000, 14,000, 280, 200 (s) I wonder whether increasing process noise would make this distribution less polarized. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Top 10% (S = 11, 19) consumes 97% resource (fitting time): (1h 40m 33s + 1h 10m 42s) / (1h 40m 33s + 1h 10m 42s + 20 sec * 18) = 10275 / (10275 + 360) = .97.
.97
is dominance index.inferencedata
link for reproducibilityamong
sbc.nc
, S = 14 forms challenging geometry in general and S = 18 has one challenging corner which sometimes make chain =3 stuckGenerally fast (every S except 14, 19)
20 second fitting
S-specific
S=11, M_c=3
2 hour fitting log (1 out of 20)
M_c-specific
S=19, M_c=3
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions