agent vs global view of innovator vs entrepreneur and their absorption vs adapt vs leapfrog strategy #176
hyunjimoon
started this conversation in
people; relating
Replies: 1 comment
-
absorption_adaption_leapfrog_strategy.pdf quick thoughts from the above scott's slide,
Charlie mentioned clockspeed is determined by below:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
scott says:
angie asks "is organization not a thing?", scott answers (in the line of) "by "things" I mean something more beneficial to others"....
it seems entrepreneurship is more perceived to be agents that innovate to "sell" with main purpose.
eric who made diagram below by classifying household sector innovators into four (participants, helpers, users, producers) said his framework cannot hold angie's entrep. type (didn't innovate as she used the existing tools to deliver to less-accessible people with minimal "sell" and self-serving purpose). This is because cannot be classified into his four t is no mail motivation to innovate (into four below (and assumed entrepreneurs are the people who innovate to
which comes first and can we understand with clockspeed (m2i is incentivized by new tech, supplier market power, and i2m is pressured by niche entrant, product complexity, org-rigidity)

other definition of startup:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions