Bayesian framework decouples inference and decision #275
hyunjimoon
started this conversation in
perspectives; sense-making
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
In Calibrating Model-Based Inferences and Decisions, Michael Betancourt explains:
sec. 3.4.1 and sec.3.4.2 of the paper contrasts Bayesian inference and Bayesian calibration. More recent explanation is in his blog Probabilistic Modeling and Statistical Inference which I find easier to parse.
based on the above, I gave feedback to Tom's slide on recent Vensim update in Bayesian aspect
Fiddaman25_BayesSD_Vensim.pdf as follows:
Might the following be more generic solution? https://mc-stan.org/docs/reference-manual/transforms.html#lower-bound-transform.section
Bob Carpenter mentioned this function was a great breakthrough during Stan conference.
-> Bayesian calibration
-> what calibration do we want?
"detection of systemic errors" is only possible with Bayesian calibration
-> frequentist calibration
as prior information is not used except for rejecting out of range and parameter uncertainty doesn't exist, this is frequentist calibration
-> combine frequentist calibration optimization or Bayesian calibration MCMC with priors ...
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions