[OTAGENT-729] bump otel to 0.142.0 by songy23 · Pull Request #44218 · DataDog/datadog-agent

songy23 · 2025-12-15T14:08:08Z

What does this PR do?

Bump otel versions to 0.142.0

Motivation

routine otel dependency update

Describe how you validated your changes

modified unit & e2e tests

Additional Notes

agent-platform-auto-pr · 2025-12-15T14:26:38Z

Go Package Import Differences

Baseline: 7a7d0ce
Comparison: 5003412

binary	os	arch	change
agent	linux	amd64	+2, -0 +go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdouttrace/internal +go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.25.0
agent	linux	arm64	+2, -0 +go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdouttrace/internal +go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.25.0
agent	windows	amd64	+2, -0 +go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdouttrace/internal +go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.25.0
agent	darwin	amd64	+2, -0 +go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdouttrace/internal +go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.25.0
agent	darwin	arm64	+2, -0 +go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdouttrace/internal +go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.25.0
heroku-agent	linux	amd64	+2, -0 +go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdouttrace/internal +go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.25.0
otel-agent	linux	amd64	+5, -3 +github.com/klauspost/compress/s2 +github.com/klauspost/compress/snappy +github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/pkg/status +github.com/prometheus/client_golang/exp/api/remote +go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdouttrace/internal -go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.30.0 -go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.34.0 -go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.8.0
otel-agent	linux	arm64	+5, -3 +github.com/klauspost/compress/s2 +github.com/klauspost/compress/snappy +github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/pkg/status +github.com/prometheus/client_golang/exp/api/remote +go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdouttrace/internal -go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.30.0 -go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.34.0 -go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.8.0
full-host-profiler	linux	amd64	+1, -4 +go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdouttrace/internal -go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.16.0 -go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.30.0 -go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.34.0 -go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.8.0
full-host-profiler	linux	arm64	+1, -4 +go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdouttrace/internal -go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.16.0 -go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.30.0 -go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.34.0 -go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.8.0

agent-platform-auto-pr · 2025-12-16T01:21:54Z

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor 02f7aef

Successful checks

Info

	Quality gate	Delta	On disk size (MiB)	Delta	On wire size (MiB)
✅	agent_deb_amd64	$${+0.15}$$	$${706.16}$$ < $${707.13}$$	$${+0.03}$$	$${173.19}$$ < $${174.16}$$
✅	agent_deb_amd64_fips	$${+0.16}$$	$${702.38}$$ < $${702.86}$$	$${-0}$$	$${172.37}$$ < $${173.5}$$
✅	agent_heroku_amd64	$${+0.17}$$	$${327.91}$$ < $${327.92}$$	$${-0.01}$$	$${87.15}$$ < $${88.21}$$
✅	agent_msi	$${-0.61}$$	$${570.8}$$ < $${982.08}$$	$${-0.02}$$	$${142.74}$$ < $${143.49}$$
✅	agent_rpm_amd64	$${+0.15}$$	$${706.14}$$ < $${707.12}$$	$${-0.08}$$	$${175.9}$$ < $${177.29}$$
✅	agent_rpm_amd64_fips	$${+0.16}$$	$${702.37}$$ < $${702.85}$$	$${+0.08}$$	$${175.57}$$ < $${176.32}$$
✅	agent_rpm_arm64	$${+0.14}$$	$${687.97}$$ < $${691.67}$$	$${+0.04}$$	$${159.35}$$ < $${160.7}$$
✅	agent_rpm_arm64_fips	$${+0.13}$$	$${685.02}$$ < $${687.54}$$	$${+0.05}$$	$${159.0}$$ < $${160.11}$$
✅	agent_suse_amd64	$${+0.15}$$	$${706.14}$$ < $${707.12}$$	$${-0.08}$$	$${175.9}$$ < $${177.29}$$
✅	agent_suse_amd64_fips	$${+0.16}$$	$${702.37}$$ < $${702.85}$$	$${+0.08}$$	$${175.57}$$ < $${176.32}$$
✅	agent_suse_arm64	$${+0.14}$$	$${687.97}$$ < $${691.67}$$	$${+0.04}$$	$${159.35}$$ < $${160.7}$$
✅	agent_suse_arm64_fips	$${+0.13}$$	$${685.02}$$ < $${687.54}$$	$${+0.05}$$	$${159.0}$$ < $${160.11}$$
✅	docker_agent_amd64	$${+0.17}$$	$${767.95}$$ < $${769.38}$$	$${+0.09}$$	$${260.84}$$ < $${262.06}$$
✅	docker_agent_arm64	$${+0.14}$$	$${774.34}$$ < $${778.35}$$	$${+0.07}$$	$${249.91}$$ < $${251.72}$$
✅	docker_agent_jmx_amd64	$${+0.17}$$	$${958.83}$$ < $${960.26}$$	$${+0.11}$$	$${329.49}$$ < $${330.69}$$
✅	docker_agent_jmx_arm64	$${+0.14}$$	$${953.94}$$ < $${957.95}$$	$${+0.06}$$	$${314.52}$$ < $${316.35}$$
✅	docker_cluster_agent_amd64	$${+0}$$	$${180.38}$$ < $${181.08}$$	$${-0}$$	$${63.72}$$ < $${64.49}$$
✅	docker_cluster_agent_arm64	$${-0.01}$$	$${196.24}$$ < $${198.49}$$	$${-0.01}$$	$${60.02}$$ < $${61.17}$$
✅	docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64	$${0}$$	$${7.13}$$ < $${7.18}$$	$${-0}$$	$${2.99}$$ < $${3.33}$$
✅	docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64	$${+0}$$	$${6.69}$$ < $${6.92}$$	$${-0}$$	$${2.73}$$ < $${3.09}$$
✅	docker_dogstatsd_amd64	$${+0.01}$$	$${38.78}$$ < $${39.38}$$	$${+0.01}$$	$${15.01}$$ < $${15.82}$$
✅	docker_dogstatsd_arm64	$${+0.06}$$	$${37.13}$$ < $${37.94}$$	$${+0.01}$$	$${14.34}$$ < $${14.83}$$
✅	dogstatsd_deb_amd64	$${+0.01}$$	$${30.0}$$ < $${30.61}$$	$${+0}$$	$${7.93}$$ < $${8.79}$$
✅	dogstatsd_deb_arm64	$${+0.01}$$	$${28.16}$$ < $${29.11}$$	$${+0}$$	$${6.81}$$ < $${7.71}$$
✅	dogstatsd_rpm_amd64	$${+0.01}$$	$${30.0}$$ < $${30.61}$$	$${+0}$$	$${7.95}$$ < $${8.8}$$
✅	dogstatsd_suse_amd64	$${+0.01}$$	$${30.0}$$ < $${30.61}$$	$${+0}$$	$${7.95}$$ < $${8.8}$$
✅	iot_agent_deb_amd64	$${0}$$	$${42.93}$$ < $${43.29}$$	$${-0}$$	$${11.24}$$ < $${12.04}$$
✅	iot_agent_deb_arm64	$${0}$$	$${40.06}$$ < $${40.92}$$	$${-0}$$	$${9.61}$$ < $${10.45}$$
✅	iot_agent_deb_armhf	$${-0}$$	$${40.64}$$ < $${41.03}$$	$${-0}$$	$${9.81}$$ < $${10.62}$$
✅	iot_agent_rpm_amd64	$${0}$$	$${42.93}$$ < $${43.29}$$	$${+0}$$	$${11.26}$$ < $${12.06}$$
✅	iot_agent_suse_amd64	$${0}$$	$${42.93}$$ < $${43.29}$$	$${+0}$$	$${11.26}$$ < $${12.06}$$

cit-pr-commenter · 2025-12-16T01:40:24Z

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: e6ba2c2d-8499-4ed8-83f2-0363755ec67e

Baseline: 3dc3117
Comparison: 5003412
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf	experiment	goal	Δ mean %	Δ mean % CI	trials	links
➖	docker_containers_cpu	% cpu utilization	+1.67	[-1.35, +4.70]	1	Logs

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf	experiment	goal	Δ mean %	Δ mean % CI	trials	links
➖	quality_gate_metrics_logs	memory utilization	+2.56	[+2.36, +2.77]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	docker_containers_cpu	% cpu utilization	+1.67	[-1.35, +4.70]	1	Logs
➖	quality_gate_logs	% cpu utilization	+1.29	[-0.20, +2.78]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	otlp_ingest_metrics	memory utilization	+0.58	[+0.43, +0.73]	1	Logs
➖	quality_gate_idle_all_features	memory utilization	+0.52	[+0.49, +0.55]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter	memory utilization	+0.30	[+0.07, +0.53]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency	egress throughput	+0.08	[-0.33, +0.49]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency	egress throughput	+0.04	[-0.01, +0.09]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency	egress throughput	+0.04	[-0.38, +0.46]	1	Logs
➖	uds_dogstatsd_to_api	ingress throughput	+0.02	[-0.12, +0.17]	1	Logs
➖	tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude	ingress throughput	-0.01	[-0.08, +0.07]	1	Logs
➖	uds_dogstatsd_to_api_v3	ingress throughput	-0.01	[-0.14, +0.13]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency	egress throughput	-0.01	[-0.39, +0.36]	1	Logs
➖	file_tree	memory utilization	-0.19	[-0.25, -0.12]	1	Logs
➖	uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders	memory utilization	-0.27	[-0.32, -0.23]	1	Logs
➖	docker_containers_memory	memory utilization	-0.35	[-0.42, -0.28]	1	Logs
➖	ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative	memory utilization	-0.58	[-0.74, -0.42]	1	Logs
➖	ddot_metrics_sum_delta	memory utilization	-0.65	[-0.87, -0.44]	1	Logs
➖	quality_gate_idle	memory utilization	-0.70	[-0.75, -0.65]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	ddot_metrics	memory utilization	-0.82	[-1.03, -0.60]	1	Logs
➖	ddot_logs	memory utilization	-1.00	[-1.07, -0.93]	1	Logs
➖	otlp_ingest_logs	memory utilization	-1.18	[-1.28, -1.09]	1	Logs
➖	tcp_syslog_to_blackhole	ingress throughput	-2.75	[-2.83, -2.66]	1	Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf	experiment	bounds_check_name	replicates_passed	links
✅	docker_containers_cpu	simple_check_run	10/10
✅	docker_containers_memory	memory_usage	10/10
✅	docker_containers_memory	simple_check_run	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency	lost_bytes	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency	lost_bytes	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency	lost_bytes	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency	lost_bytes	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	quality_gate_idle	intake_connections	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle	memory_usage	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	intake_connections	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	memory_usage	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	intake_connections	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	lost_bytes	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	memory_usage	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	cpu_usage	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	intake_connections	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	lost_bytes	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	memory_usage	10/10	bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

songy23 · 2025-12-18T12:49:07Z

/merge

dd-devflow-routing-codex · 2025-12-18T12:49:11Z

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2025-12-18 12:49:11 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

2025-12-18 12:49:17 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This pull request is not mergeable according to GitHub. Common reasons include pending required checks, missing approvals, or merge conflicts — but it could also be blocked by other repository rules or settings.
It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.

2025-12-18 14:41:47 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request was unqueued

yang.song@datadoghq.com unqueued this merge request

songy23 · 2025-12-18T14:41:40Z

/merge -c

dd-devflow-routing-codex · 2025-12-18T14:41:43Z

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2025-12-18 14:41:43 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge -c

L3n41c

LGTM for the single file owned by @DataDog/container-integrations.

songy23 · 2025-12-18T16:36:34Z

/merge

dd-devflow-routing-codex · 2025-12-18T16:36:38Z

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2025-12-18 16:36:38 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

2025-12-18 16:36:50 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This pull request is not mergeable according to GitHub. Common reasons include pending required checks, missing approvals, or merge conflicts — but it could also be blocked by other repository rules or settings.
It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.

2025-12-18 20:37:05 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request was unqueued

devflow unqueued this merge request: It did not become mergeable within the expected time

songy23 · 2025-12-18T21:31:11Z

/merge

dd-devflow-routing-codex · 2025-12-18T21:31:16Z

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2025-12-18 21:31:16 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

2025-12-18 21:31:22 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This pull request is not mergeable according to GitHub. Common reasons include pending required checks, missing approvals, or merge conflicts — but it could also be blocked by other repository rules or settings.
It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.

2025-12-18 23:10:12 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: merge request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 1h (p90).

2025-12-18 23:48:46 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

### What does this PR do? Bump otel versions to 0.142.0 ### Motivation routine otel dependency update ### Describe how you validated your changes modified unit & e2e tests ### Additional Notes Co-authored-by: yang.song <yang.song@datadoghq.com>

songy23 added this to the 7.75.0 milestone Dec 15, 2025

songy23 added changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/opentelemetry-agent labels Dec 15, 2025

songy23 added 4 commits December 15, 2025 19:39

Fix configoptional.Optional

11c6657

Fix tests

20452dd

[OTAGENT-729] bump otel to 0.142.0

dcf7f41

licenses

41eac5b

songy23 force-pushed the yang.song/OTAGENT-729 branch from ea29c70 to 41eac5b Compare December 16, 2025 00:43

github-actions bot added component/system-probe long review PR is complex, plan time to review it labels Dec 16, 2025

songy23 and others added 2 commits December 15, 2025 21:52

Fix tests

83dfb3c

Merge branch 'main' into yang.song/OTAGENT-729

8d4d64d

songy23 marked this pull request as ready for review December 16, 2025 13:58

songy23 requested review from a team as code owners December 16, 2025 13:58

songy23 requested a review from mackjmr December 16, 2025 13:58

songy23 added the ask-review Ask required teams to review this PR label Dec 16, 2025

mackjmr approved these changes Dec 16, 2025

View reviewed changes

BaptisteFoy approved these changes Dec 16, 2025

View reviewed changes

songy23 and others added 2 commits December 16, 2025 13:24

Merge branch 'main' into yang.song/OTAGENT-729

8433a32

Merge branch 'main' into yang.song/OTAGENT-729

f09de39

chouetz approved these changes Dec 18, 2025

View reviewed changes

Merge branch 'main' into yang.song/OTAGENT-729

0bc0f98

songy23 added 2 commits December 18, 2025 09:59

Merge branch 'main' into yang.song/OTAGENT-729

8acd2c5

Fix deprecation

9472f74

songy23 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 18, 2025 15:14

tidy

9e99b83

L3n41c approved these changes Dec 18, 2025

View reviewed changes

songy23 added 2 commits December 18, 2025 13:02

Merge branch 'main' into yang.song/OTAGENT-729

d24ecd3

Merge branch 'main' into yang.song/OTAGENT-729

5003412

dd-mergequeue bot merged commit a486e84 into main Dec 18, 2025
604 checks passed

dd-mergequeue bot deleted the yang.song/OTAGENT-729 branch December 18, 2025 23:48

Conversation

songy23 commented Dec 15, 2025

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Describe how you validated your changes

Additional Notes

Uh oh!

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Dec 15, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Go Package Import Differences

Uh oh!

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Dec 16, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Static quality checks

Info

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Dec 16, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Experiments ignored for regressions

Fine details of change detection per experiment

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

Explanation

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Uh oh!

songy23 commented Dec 18, 2025

Uh oh!

dd-devflow-routing-codex bot commented Dec 18, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

songy23 commented Dec 18, 2025

Uh oh!

dd-devflow-routing-codex bot commented Dec 18, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

L3n41c left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

songy23 commented Dec 18, 2025

Uh oh!

dd-devflow-routing-codex bot commented Dec 18, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

songy23 commented Dec 18, 2025

Uh oh!

dd-devflow-routing-codex bot commented Dec 18, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

5 participants

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Dec 15, 2025 •

edited

Loading

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Dec 16, 2025 •

edited

Loading

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Dec 16, 2025 •

edited

Loading

dd-devflow-routing-codex bot commented Dec 18, 2025 •

edited

Loading

dd-devflow-routing-codex bot commented Dec 18, 2025 •

edited

Loading

dd-devflow-routing-codex bot commented Dec 18, 2025 •

edited

Loading

dd-devflow-routing-codex bot commented Dec 18, 2025 •

edited

Loading