Use list assertion for ListApmRetentionFilters test (#1744)

Co-authored-by: ci.datadog-api-spec <[email protected]>

Author: api-clients-generation-pipeline[bot]

.apigentools-info

@@ -4,13 +4,13 @@
     "spec_versions": {
         "v1": {
             "apigentools_version": "1.6.6",
-            "regenerated": "2023-10-30 20:47:57.387992",
-            "spec_repo_commit": "98cfa2fd"
+            "regenerated": "2023-10-31 15:36:23.736957",
+            "spec_repo_commit": "38f019bb"
         },
         "v2": {
             "apigentools_version": "1.6.6",
-            "regenerated": "2023-10-30 20:47:57.405469",
-            "spec_repo_commit": "98cfa2fd"
+            "regenerated": "2023-10-31 15:36:23.757201",
+            "spec_repo_commit": "38f019bb"
         }
     }
 }

tests/v2/features/apm_retention_filters.feature

@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Feature: APM Retention Filters
     And new "ListApmRetentionFilters" request
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 200 OK
-    And the response "data[2].id" has the same value as "retention_filter.data.id"
+    And the response "data" has item with field "id" with value "{{ retention_filter.data.id }}"
 
   @generated @skip @team:DataDog/apm-trace-intake
   Scenario: Re-order retention filters returns "Bad Request" response