diff --git a/.apigentools-info b/.apigentools-info
index 792a8851b5e6..72c61d52c3ff 100644
--- a/.apigentools-info
+++ b/.apigentools-info
@@ -4,13 +4,13 @@
     "spec_versions": {
         "v1": {
             "apigentools_version": "1.6.6",
-            "regenerated": "2025-04-11 12:58:58.679153",
-            "spec_repo_commit": "7307da21"
+            "regenerated": "2025-04-11 15:05:29.390383",
+            "spec_repo_commit": "d209cd40"
         },
         "v2": {
             "apigentools_version": "1.6.6",
-            "regenerated": "2025-04-11 12:58:58.695743",
-            "spec_repo_commit": "7307da21"
+            "regenerated": "2025-04-11 15:05:29.407748",
+            "spec_repo_commit": "d209cd40"
         }
     }
 }
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/features/v2/application_security.feature b/features/v2/application_security.feature
index 0a68585a02e7..f10a470ff2e0 100644
--- a/features/v2/application_security.feature
+++ b/features/v2/application_security.feature
@@ -13,42 +13,42 @@ Feature: Application Security
     And a valid "appKeyAuth" key in the system
     And an instance of "ApplicationSecurity" API
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Create a WAF custom rule returns "Bad Request" response
     Given new "CreateApplicationSecurityWafCustomRule" request
     And body with value {"data": {"attributes": {"action": {"action": "block_request", "parameters": {"location": "/blocking", "status_code": 403}}, "blocking": false, "conditions": [{"operator": "match_regex", "parameters": {"data": "blocked_users", "inputs": [{"address": "server.db.statement", "key_path": []}], "list": [], "options": {"case_sensitive": false, "min_length": 0}, "regex": "path.*", "value": "custom_tag"}}], "enabled": false, "name": "Block request from a bad useragent", "path_glob": "/api/search/*", "scope": [{"env": "prod", "service": "billing-service"}], "tags": {"category": "business_logic", "type": "users.login.success"}}, "type": "custom_rule"}}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 400 Bad Request
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Create a WAF custom rule returns "Concurrent Modification" response
     Given new "CreateApplicationSecurityWafCustomRule" request
     And body with value {"data": {"attributes": {"action": {"action": "block_request", "parameters": {"location": "/blocking", "status_code": 403}}, "blocking": false, "conditions": [{"operator": "match_regex", "parameters": {"data": "blocked_users", "inputs": [{"address": "server.db.statement", "key_path": []}], "list": [], "options": {"case_sensitive": false, "min_length": 0}, "regex": "path.*", "value": "custom_tag"}}], "enabled": false, "name": "Block request from a bad useragent", "path_glob": "/api/search/*", "scope": [{"env": "prod", "service": "billing-service"}], "tags": {"category": "business_logic", "type": "users.login.success"}}, "type": "custom_rule"}}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 409 Concurrent Modification
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Create a WAF custom rule returns "Created" response
     Given new "CreateApplicationSecurityWafCustomRule" request
     And body with value {"data": {"attributes": {"action": {"action": "block_request", "parameters": {"location": "/blocking", "status_code": 403}}, "blocking": false, "conditions": [{"operator": "match_regex", "parameters": {"data": "blocked_users", "inputs": [{"address": "server.db.statement", "key_path": []}], "list": [], "options": {"case_sensitive": false, "min_length": 0}, "regex": "path.*", "value": "custom_tag"}}], "enabled": false, "name": "Block request from a bad useragent", "path_glob": "/api/search/*", "scope": [{"env": "prod", "service": "billing-service"}], "tags": {"category": "business_logic", "type": "users.login.success"}}, "type": "custom_rule"}}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 201 Created
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Create a WAF exclusion filter returns "Bad Request" response
     Given new "CreateApplicationSecurityWafExclusionFilter" request
     And body with value {"data": {"attributes": {"description": "Exclude false positives on a path", "enabled": true, "ip_list": ["198.51.100.72"], "on_match": "monitor", "parameters": ["list.search.query"], "path_glob": "/accounts/*", "rules_target": [{"rule_id": "dog-913-009", "tags": {"category": "attack_attempt", "type": "lfi"}}], "scope": [{"env": "www", "service": "prod"}]}, "type": "exclusion_filter"}}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 400 Bad Request
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Create a WAF exclusion filter returns "Concurrent Modification" response
     Given new "CreateApplicationSecurityWafExclusionFilter" request
     And body with value {"data": {"attributes": {"description": "Exclude false positives on a path", "enabled": true, "ip_list": ["198.51.100.72"], "on_match": "monitor", "parameters": ["list.search.query"], "path_glob": "/accounts/*", "rules_target": [{"rule_id": "dog-913-009", "tags": {"category": "attack_attempt", "type": "lfi"}}], "scope": [{"env": "www", "service": "prod"}]}, "type": "exclusion_filter"}}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 409 Concurrent Modification
 
-  @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Create a WAF exclusion filter returns "OK" response
     Given new "CreateApplicationSecurityWafExclusionFilter" request
     And body with value {"data": {"attributes": {"description": "Exclude false positives on a path", "enabled": true, "parameters": ["list.search.query"], "path_glob": "/accounts/*", "rules_target": [{"tags": {"category": "attack_attempt", "type": "lfi"}}], "scope": [{"env": "www", "service": "prod"}]}, "type": "exclusion_filter"}}
@@ -56,49 +56,49 @@ Feature: Application Security
     Then the response status is 200 OK
     And the response "data.attributes.enabled" is equal to true
 
-  @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Create a legacy WAF exclusion filter returns "Bad Request" response
     Given new "CreateApplicationSecurityWafExclusionFilter" request
     And body with value {"data": {"attributes": {"description": "Exclude false positives on a path", "enabled": true, "event_query": "test:1"}, "type": "exclusion_filter"}}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 400 Bad Request
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Delete a WAF Custom Rule returns "Concurrent Modification" response
     Given new "DeleteApplicationSecurityWafCustomRule" request
     And request contains "custom_rule_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 409 Concurrent Modification
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Delete a WAF Custom Rule returns "No Content" response
     Given new "DeleteApplicationSecurityWafCustomRule" request
     And request contains "custom_rule_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 204 No Content
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Delete a WAF Custom Rule returns "Not Found" response
     Given new "DeleteApplicationSecurityWafCustomRule" request
     And request contains "custom_rule_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 404 Not Found
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Delete a WAF exclusion filter returns "Concurrent Modification" response
     Given new "DeleteApplicationSecurityWafExclusionFilter" request
     And request contains "exclusion_filter_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 409 Concurrent Modification
 
-  @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Delete a WAF exclusion filter returns "Not Found" response
     Given new "DeleteApplicationSecurityWafExclusionFilter" request
     And request contains "exclusion_filter_id" parameter with value "unknown"
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 404 Not Found
 
-  @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Delete a WAF exclusion filter returns "OK" response
     Given there is a valid "exclusion_filter" in the system
     And new "DeleteApplicationSecurityWafExclusionFilter" request
@@ -106,21 +106,21 @@ Feature: Application Security
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 204 OK
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Get a WAF custom rule returns "OK" response
     Given new "GetApplicationSecurityWafCustomRule" request
     And request contains "custom_rule_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 200 OK
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Get a WAF exclusion filter returns "Not Found" response
     Given new "GetApplicationSecurityWafExclusionFilter" request
     And request contains "exclusion_filter_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 404 Not Found
 
-  @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Get a WAF exclusion filter returns "OK" response
     Given there is a valid "exclusion_filter" in the system
     And new "GetApplicationSecurityWafExclusionFilter" request
@@ -128,19 +128,19 @@ Feature: Application Security
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 200 OK
 
-  @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: List all WAF custom rules returns "OK" response
     Given new "ListApplicationSecurityWAFCustomRules" request
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 200 OK
 
-  @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: List all WAF exclusion filters returns "OK" response
     Given new "ListApplicationSecurityWafExclusionFilters" request
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 200 OK
 
-  @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Update a WAF Custom Rule returns "Bad Request" response
     Given there is a valid "custom_rule" in the system
     And new "UpdateApplicationSecurityWafCustomRule" request
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ Feature: Application Security
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 400 Bad Request
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Update a WAF Custom Rule returns "Concurrent Modification" response
     Given new "UpdateApplicationSecurityWafCustomRule" request
     And request contains "custom_rule_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ Feature: Application Security
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 409 Concurrent Modification
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Update a WAF Custom Rule returns "Not Found" response
     Given new "UpdateApplicationSecurityWafCustomRule" request
     And request contains "custom_rule_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ Feature: Application Security
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 404 Not Found
 
-  @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Update a WAF Custom Rule returns "OK" response
     Given there is a valid "custom_rule" in the system
     And new "UpdateApplicationSecurityWafCustomRule" request
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ Feature: Application Security
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 200 OK
 
-  @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Update a WAF exclusion filter returns "Bad Request" response
     Given there is a valid "custom_rule" in the system
     And new "UpdateApplicationSecurityWafExclusionFilter" request
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ Feature: Application Security
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 400 Bad Request
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Update a WAF exclusion filter returns "Concurrent Modification" response
     Given new "UpdateApplicationSecurityWafExclusionFilter" request
     And request contains "exclusion_filter_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ Feature: Application Security
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 409 Concurrent Modification
 
-  @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Update a WAF exclusion filter returns "Not Found" response
     Given new "UpdateApplicationSecurityWafExclusionFilter" request
     And request contains "exclusion_filter_id" parameter with value "unknown"
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ Feature: Application Security
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 404 Not Found
 
-  @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Update a WAF exclusion filter returns "OK" response
     Given there is a valid "exclusion_filter" in the system
     And new "UpdateApplicationSecurityWafExclusionFilter" request
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ Feature: Application Security
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 200 OK
 
-  @team:DataDog/asm-respond-backend
+  @team:DataDog/asm-backend
   Scenario: Update a legacy WAF exclusion filter returns "Bad Request" response
     Given there is a valid "exclusion_filter" in the system
     And new "UpdateApplicationSecurityWafExclusionFilter" request