ES|QL: fix join masking eval (elastic#126614) (elastic#127149)

luigidellaquila · web-flow · commit 8c57db8f2c04 · 2025-04-23T00:10:29.000+10:00
diff --git a/docs/changelog/126614.yaml b/docs/changelog/126614.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+pr: 126614
+summary: Fix join masking eval
+area: ES|QL
+type: bug
+issues: []
diff --git a/x-pack/plugin/esql/qa/server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/qa/rest/generative/GenerativeRestTest.java b/x-pack/plugin/esql/qa/server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/qa/rest/generative/GenerativeRestTest.java
@@ -44,8 +44,13 @@ public abstract class GenerativeRestTest extends ESRestTestCase {
         // Awaiting fixes
         "estimated row size \\[0\\] wasn't set", // https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/121739
         "unknown physical plan node \\[OrderExec\\]", // https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/120817
-        "Unknown column \\[<all-fields-projected>\\]", // https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/121741
-        //
+        "Unknown column \\[<all-fields-projected>\\]", // https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/121741,
+        "Plan \\[ProjectExec\\[\\[<no-fields>.* optimized incorrectly due to missing references", // https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/125866
+        "only supports KEYWORD or TEXT values, found expression", // https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/126017
+        "token recognition error at: '``", // https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/125870
+        "Unknown column \\[.*\\]", // https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/126026
+        "optimized incorrectly due to missing references", // https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/116781
+        "No matches found for pattern", // https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/126418
         "The incoming YAML document exceeds the limit:" // still to investigate, but it seems to be specific to the test framework
     );
 
diff --git a/x-pack/plugin/esql/qa/testFixtures/src/main/resources/lookup-join.csv-spec b/x-pack/plugin/esql/qa/testFixtures/src/main/resources/lookup-join.csv-spec
@@ -1502,3 +1502,45 @@ from *
 salary_change.long:double|foo:long
 5.0                      |1698069301543123456
 ;
+
+
+joinMaskingEval
+required_capability: join_lookup_v12
+required_capability: fix_join_masking_eval
+from languag* 
+| eval type = null 
+| rename language_name as message 
+| lookup join message_types_lookup on message 
+| rename type as message 
+| lookup join message_types_lookup on message 
+| keep `language.name`
+;
+
+ignoreOrder:true
+language.name:text
+null
+null
+null
+null
+null
+null
+null
+null
+null
+null
+null
+null
+null
+null
+null
+null
+null
+null
+null
+null
+null
+English
+French
+Spanish
+German
+;
diff --git a/x-pack/plugin/esql/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/action/EsqlCapabilities.java b/x-pack/plugin/esql/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/action/EsqlCapabilities.java
@@ -711,7 +711,13 @@ public enum Cap {
          * the ownership of that block - but didn't account for the fact that the caller might close it, leading to double releases
          * in some union type queries. C.f. https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/125850
          */
-        FIX_DOUBLY_RELEASED_NULL_BLOCKS_IN_VALUESOURCEREADER;
+        FIX_DOUBLY_RELEASED_NULL_BLOCKS_IN_VALUESOURCEREADER,
+
+        /**
+         * During resolution (pre-analysis) we have to consider that joins or enriches can override EVALuated values
+         * https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/126419
+         */
+        FIX_JOIN_MASKING_EVAL;
 
         private final boolean enabled;
 
diff --git a/x-pack/plugin/esql/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/session/EsqlSession.java b/x-pack/plugin/esql/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/session/EsqlSession.java
@@ -58,11 +58,20 @@
 import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.parser.QueryParams;
 import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.plan.IndexPattern;
 import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.plan.logical.Aggregate;
+import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.plan.logical.Drop;
 import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.plan.logical.Enrich;
+import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.plan.logical.Eval;
+import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.plan.logical.Filter;
+import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.plan.logical.InlineStats;
 import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.plan.logical.Keep;
+import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.plan.logical.Limit;
 import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.plan.logical.LogicalPlan;
+import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.plan.logical.MvExpand;
+import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.plan.logical.OrderBy;
 import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.plan.logical.Project;
 import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.plan.logical.RegexExtract;
+import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.plan.logical.Rename;
+import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.plan.logical.TopN;
 import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.plan.logical.UnresolvedRelation;
 import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.plan.logical.join.InlineJoin;
 import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.plan.logical.join.JoinTypes;
@@ -573,6 +582,8 @@ static PreAnalysisResult fieldNames(LogicalPlan parsed, Set<String> enrichPolicy
         AttributeSet keepJoinReferences = new AttributeSet();
         Set<String> wildcardJoinIndices = new java.util.HashSet<>();
 
+        boolean[] canRemoveAliases = new boolean[] { true };
+
         parsed.forEachDown(p -> {// go over each plan top-down
             if (p instanceof RegexExtract re) { // for Grok and Dissect
                 // remove other down-the-tree references to the extracted fields
@@ -618,20 +629,37 @@ static PreAnalysisResult fieldNames(LogicalPlan parsed, Set<String> enrichPolicy
                 }
             }
 
-            // remove any already discovered UnresolvedAttributes that are in fact aliases defined later down in the tree
-            // for example "from test | eval x = salary | stats max = max(x) by gender"
-            // remove the UnresolvedAttribute "x", since that is an Alias defined in "eval"
-            AttributeSet planRefs = p.references();
-            Set<String> fieldNames = planRefs.names();
-            p.forEachExpressionDown(Alias.class, alias -> {
-                // do not remove the UnresolvedAttribute that has the same name as its alias, ie "rename id = id"
-                // or the UnresolvedAttributes that are used in Functions that have aliases "STATS id = MAX(id)"
-                if (fieldNames.contains(alias.name())) {
-                    return;
-                }
-                references.removeIf(attr -> matchByName(attr, alias.name(), keepCommandReferences.contains(attr)));
-            });
+            // If the current node in the tree is of type JOIN (lookup join, inlinestats) or ENRICH or other type of
+            // command that we may add in the future which can override already defined Aliases with EVAL
+            // (for example
+            //
+            // from test
+            // | eval ip = 123
+            // | enrich ips_policy ON hostname
+            // | rename ip AS my_ip
+            //
+            // and ips_policy enriches the results with the same name ip field),
+            // these aliases should be kept in the list of fields.
+            if (canRemoveAliases[0] && couldOverrideAliases(p)) {
+                canRemoveAliases[0] = false;
+            }
+            if (canRemoveAliases[0]) {
+                // remove any already discovered UnresolvedAttributes that are in fact aliases defined later down in the tree
+                // for example "from test | eval x = salary | stats max = max(x) by gender"
+                // remove the UnresolvedAttribute "x", since that is an Alias defined in "eval"
+                AttributeSet planRefs = p.references();
+                Set<String> fieldNames = planRefs.names();
+                p.forEachExpressionDown(Alias.class, alias -> {
+                    // do not remove the UnresolvedAttribute that has the same name as its alias, ie "rename id AS id"
+                    // or the UnresolvedAttributes that are used in Functions that have aliases "STATS id = MAX(id)"
+                    if (fieldNames.contains(alias.name())) {
+                        return;
+                    }
+                    references.removeIf(attr -> matchByName(attr, alias.name(), keepCommandReferences.contains(attr)));
+                });
+            }
         });
+
         // Add JOIN ON column references afterward to avoid Alias removal
         references.addAll(keepJoinReferences);
         // If any JOIN commands need wildcard field-caps calls, persist the index names
@@ -655,6 +683,29 @@ static PreAnalysisResult fieldNames(LogicalPlan parsed, Set<String> enrichPolicy
         }
     }
 
+    /**
+     * Could a plan "accidentally" override aliases?
+     * Examples are JOIN and ENRICH, that _could_ produce fields with the same
+     * name of an existing alias, based on their index mapping.
+     * Here we just have to consider commands where this information is not available before index resolution,
+     * eg. EVAL, GROK, DISSECT can override an alias, but we know it in advance, ie. we don't need to resolve indices to know.
+     */
+    private static boolean couldOverrideAliases(LogicalPlan p) {
+        return (p instanceof Aggregate
+            || p instanceof Drop
+            || p instanceof Eval
+            || p instanceof Filter
+            || p instanceof InlineStats
+            || p instanceof Keep
+            || p instanceof Limit
+            || p instanceof MvExpand
+            || p instanceof OrderBy
+            || p instanceof Project
+            || p instanceof RegexExtract
+            || p instanceof Rename
+            || p instanceof TopN) == false;
+    }
+
     private static boolean matchByName(Attribute attr, String other, boolean skipIfPattern) {
         boolean isPattern = Regex.isSimpleMatchPattern(attr.name());
         if (skipIfPattern && isPattern) {
diff --git a/x-pack/plugin/esql/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/session/IndexResolverFieldNamesTests.java b/x-pack/plugin/esql/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/session/IndexResolverFieldNamesTests.java
@@ -478,13 +478,16 @@ public void testDropAllColumns_WithStats() {
     }
 
     public void testEnrichOn() {
-        assertFieldNames("""
-            from employees
-            | sort emp_no
-            | limit 1
-            | eval x = to_string(languages)
-            | enrich languages_policy on x
-            | keep emp_no, language_name""", Set.of("emp_no", "emp_no.*", "languages", "languages.*", "language_name", "language_name.*"));
+        assertFieldNames(
+            """
+                from employees
+                | sort emp_no
+                | limit 1
+                | eval x = to_string(languages)
+                | enrich languages_policy on x
+                | keep emp_no, language_name""",
+            Set.of("emp_no", "emp_no.*", "languages", "languages.*", "language_name", "language_name.*", "x", "x.*")
+        );
     }
 
     public void testEnrichOn2() {
@@ -494,7 +497,7 @@ public void testEnrichOn2() {
             | enrich languages_policy on x
             | keep emp_no, language_name
             | sort emp_no
-            | limit 1""", Set.of("emp_no", "emp_no.*", "languages", "languages.*", "language_name", "language_name.*"));
+            | limit 1""", Set.of("emp_no", "emp_no.*", "languages", "languages.*", "language_name", "language_name.*", "x", "x.*"));
     }
 
     public void testUselessEnrich() {
@@ -512,15 +515,15 @@ public void testSimpleSortLimit() {
             | enrich languages_policy on x
             | keep emp_no, language_name
             | sort emp_no
-            | limit 1""", Set.of("languages", "languages.*", "emp_no", "emp_no.*", "language_name", "language_name.*"));
+            | limit 1""", Set.of("languages", "languages.*", "emp_no", "emp_no.*", "language_name", "language_name.*", "x", "x.*"));
     }
 
     public void testWith() {
         assertFieldNames(
             """
                 from employees | eval x = to_string(languages) | keep emp_no, x | sort emp_no | limit 1
                 | enrich languages_policy on x with language_name""",
-            Set.of("emp_no", "emp_no.*", "languages", "languages.*", "language_name", "language_name.*")
+            Set.of("emp_no", "emp_no.*", "languages", "languages.*", "language_name", "language_name.*", "x", "x.*")
         );
     }
 
@@ -529,7 +532,7 @@ public void testWithAlias() {
             """
                 from employees  | sort emp_no | limit 3 | eval x = to_string(languages) | keep emp_no, x
                 | enrich languages_policy on x with lang = language_name""",
-            Set.of("emp_no", "emp_no.*", "languages", "languages.*", "language_name", "language_name.*")
+            Set.of("emp_no", "emp_no.*", "languages", "languages.*", "language_name", "language_name.*", "x", "x.*")
         );
     }
 
@@ -538,7 +541,7 @@ public void testWithAliasSort() {
             """
                 from employees | eval x = to_string(languages) | keep emp_no, x  | sort emp_no | limit 3
                 | enrich languages_policy on x with lang = language_name""",
-            Set.of("emp_no", "emp_no.*", "languages", "languages.*", "language_name", "language_name.*")
+            Set.of("emp_no", "emp_no.*", "languages", "languages.*", "language_name", "language_name.*", "x", "x.*")
         );
     }
 
@@ -547,7 +550,7 @@ public void testWithAliasAndPlain() {
             """
                 from employees  | sort emp_no desc | limit 3 | eval x = to_string(languages) | keep emp_no, x
                 | enrich languages_policy on x with lang = language_name, language_name""",
-            Set.of("emp_no", "emp_no.*", "languages", "languages.*", "language_name", "language_name.*")
+            Set.of("emp_no", "emp_no.*", "languages", "languages.*", "language_name", "language_name.*", "x", "x.*")
         );
     }
 
@@ -556,7 +559,7 @@ public void testWithTwoAliasesSameProp() {
             """
                 from employees  | sort emp_no | limit 1 | eval x = to_string(languages) | keep emp_no, x
                 | enrich languages_policy on x with lang = language_name, lang2 = language_name""",
-            Set.of("emp_no", "emp_no.*", "languages", "languages.*", "language_name", "language_name.*")
+            Set.of("emp_no", "emp_no.*", "languages", "languages.*", "language_name", "language_name.*", "x", "x.*")
         );
     }
 
@@ -565,7 +568,7 @@ public void testRedundantWith() {
             """
                 from employees  | sort emp_no | limit 1 | eval x = to_string(languages) | keep emp_no, x
                 | enrich languages_policy on x with language_name, language_name""",
-            Set.of("emp_no", "emp_no.*", "languages", "languages.*", "language_name", "language_name.*")
+            Set.of("emp_no", "emp_no.*", "languages", "languages.*", "language_name", "language_name.*", "x", "x.*")
         );
     }
 
@@ -588,28 +591,34 @@ public void testConstantNullInput() {
                 | eval x = to_string(languages)
                 | keep emp_no, x
                 | enrich languages_policy on x with language_name, language_name""",
-            Set.of("languages", "languages.*", "emp_no", "emp_no.*", "language_name", "language_name.*")
+            Set.of("languages", "languages.*", "emp_no", "emp_no.*", "language_name", "language_name.*", "x", "x.*")
         );
     }
 
     public void testEnrichEval() {
-        assertFieldNames("""
-            from employees
-            | eval x = to_string(languages)
-            | enrich languages_policy on x with lang = language_name
-            | eval language = concat(x, "-", lang)
-            | keep emp_no, x, lang, language
-            | sort emp_no desc | limit 3""", Set.of("languages", "languages.*", "emp_no", "emp_no.*", "language_name", "language_name.*"));
+        assertFieldNames(
+            """
+                from employees
+                | eval x = to_string(languages)
+                | enrich languages_policy on x with lang = language_name
+                | eval language = concat(x, "-", lang)
+                | keep emp_no, x, lang, language
+                | sort emp_no desc | limit 3""",
+            Set.of("languages", "languages.*", "emp_no", "emp_no.*", "language_name", "language_name.*", "x", "x.*", "lang", "lang.*")
+        );
     }
 
     public void testSimple() {
-        assertFieldNames("""
-            from employees
-            | eval x = 1, y = to_string(languages)
-            | enrich languages_policy on y
-            | where x > 1
-            | keep emp_no, language_name
-            | limit 1""", Set.of("emp_no", "emp_no.*", "languages", "languages.*", "language_name", "language_name.*"));
+        assertFieldNames(
+            """
+                from employees
+                | eval x = 1, y = to_string(languages)
+                | enrich languages_policy on y
+                | where x > 1
+                | keep emp_no, language_name
+                | limit 1""",
+            Set.of("emp_no", "emp_no.*", "languages", "languages.*", "language_name", "language_name.*", "x", "y", "x.*", "y.*")
+        );
     }
 
     public void testEvalNullSort() {
@@ -1575,6 +1584,54 @@ public void testMultiLookupJoinSameIndexKeepAfter() {
         );
     }
 
+    public void testJoinMaskingKeep() {
+        assertFieldNames(
+            """
+                from languag*
+                | eval type = null
+                | rename language_name as message
+                | lookup join message_types_lookup on message
+                | rename type as message
+                | lookup join message_types_lookup on message
+                | keep `language.name`""",
+            Set.of("language.name", "type", "language_name", "message", "language_name.*", "message.*", "type.*", "language.name.*")
+        );
+    }
+
+    public void testJoinMaskingKeep2() {
+        assertFieldNames("""
+            from languag*
+            | eval type = "foo"
+            | rename type as message
+            | lookup join message_types_lookup on message
+            | rename type as message
+            | lookup join message_types_lookup on message
+            | keep `language.name`""", Set.of("language.name", "type", "message", "message.*", "type.*", "language.name.*"));
+    }
+
+    public void testEnrichMaskingEvalOn() {
+        assertFieldNames("""
+            from employees
+            | eval language_name = null
+            | enrich languages_policy on languages
+            | rename language_name as languages
+            | eval languages = length(languages)
+            | enrich languages_policy on languages
+            | keep emp_no, language_name""", Set.of("emp_no", "language_name", "languages", "language_name.*", "languages.*", "emp_no.*"));
+    }
+
+    public void testEnrichAndJoinMaskingEvalWh() {
+        assertFieldNames("""
+            from employees
+            | eval language_name = null
+            | enrich languages_policy on languages
+            | rename language_name as languages
+            | eval languages = length(languages)
+            | enrich languages_policy on languages
+            | lookup join message_types_lookup on language_name
+            | keep emp_no, language_name""", Set.of("emp_no", "language_name", "languages", "language_name.*", "languages.*", "emp_no.*"));
+    }
+
     private Set<String> fieldNames(String query, Set<String> enrichPolicyMatchFields) {
         var preAnalysisResult = new EsqlSession.PreAnalysisResult(null);
         return EsqlSession.fieldNames(parser.createStatement(query), enrichPolicyMatchFields, preAnalysisResult).fieldNames();
