|
268 | 268 |
|
269 | 269 | **references**: ARRAY |
270 | 270 | For each data segment that supports your analysis, provide: |
271 | | -- **segment_id**: int - The numerical identifier of the data segment (must be accurate) |
| 271 | +- **segment_id**: int - The numerical identifier of the data segment (must be accurate). Each segment_id looks like "SEGMENT_ID_<number>" in the input data - extract only the number portion (e.g., from "SEGMENT_ID_123" use 123) |
272 | 272 | - **description**: string - Explain how this segment contributes to your overall analysis and its specific relevance to the topic |
273 | 273 |
|
| 274 | +## Critical Reference Guidelines |
| 275 | +- **ONLY include segment IDs that are explicitly mentioned in the input data with the format "SEGMENT_ID_<number>"** |
| 276 | +- **ONLY include segments that directly support claims, insights, or evidence in your analysis** |
| 277 | +- **DO NOT include a segment reference unless you can clearly explain its specific relevance to your findings** |
| 278 | +- **Extract the numeric ID correctly**: From "SEGMENT_ID_123" use 123, from "SEGMENT_ID_456" use 456 |
| 279 | +- **Quality over quantity**: It's better to have fewer, highly relevant references than many irrelevant ones |
| 280 | +- **Verify relevance**: Each reference must correspond to content you actually analyzed and cited in your summary |
| 281 | +
|
274 | 282 | ## Quality Standards |
275 | 283 | - **Depth**: Provide comprehensive analysis that goes beyond surface-level summarization |
276 | 284 | - **Variety**: Use diverse language and avoid repetitive phrases |
|
348 | 356 | - Explain what the investigation covers and why it matters |
349 | 357 | - Should orient readers to the scope and purpose of the multi-aspect analysis |
350 | 358 |
|
351 | | -**summary**: string (4-6 paragraphs with markdown formatting) |
| 359 | +**summary**: string (2-3 paragraphs with markdown formatting) |
352 | 360 | - Develop an in-depth, multi-section analysis with proper markdown formatting |
353 | 361 | - Include clear subsections with descriptive headings |
354 | 362 | - Present findings in logical progression from key insights to supporting details |
|
451 | 459 | - Address the broader implications and significance of the findings |
452 | 460 |
|
453 | 461 | ### Segments |
454 | | -- For each relevant document summary, provide accurate segment_id and description |
455 | | -- Explain how each segment contributes to the overall analysis and its specific relevance |
| 462 | +For each data segment that supports your analysis, provide: |
| 463 | +- **segment_id**: int - The numerical identifier of the data segment (must be accurate). Each segment_id looks like "SEGMENT_ID_<number>" in the input data - extract only the number portion (e.g., from "SEGMENT_ID_123" use 123) |
| 464 | +- **description**: string - Explain how this segment contributes to your overall analysis and its specific relevance to the topic |
| 465 | +
|
| 466 | +## Critical Segment Reference Guidelines |
| 467 | +- **ONLY include segment IDs that are explicitly mentioned in the document summaries with the format "SEGMENT_ID_<number>"** |
| 468 | +- **Extract the numeric ID correctly**: From "SEGMENT_ID_123" use 123, from "SEGMENT_ID_456" use 456 |
| 469 | +- **ONLY include segments that directly support claims, insights, or evidence in your analysis** |
| 470 | +- **DO NOT include a segment reference unless you can clearly explain its specific relevance to your findings** |
| 471 | +- **Quality over quantity**: It's better to have fewer, highly relevant references than many irrelevant ones |
| 472 | +- **Verify relevance**: Each reference must correspond to content you actually analyzed and cited in your summary |
456 | 473 |
|
457 | 474 | ## Quality Standards |
458 | 475 | - **Depth**: Provide comprehensive analysis that goes beyond surface-level summarization |
|
0 commit comments