Skip to content

localhost locked "Security Protection" isn't secure #431

@dskvr

Description

@dskvr

While I know it seems to be possible, it is incredibly frustrating to get this working in a headless environment. I have spent the day attempting to use this in a docker-compose only workflow all day, and I keep hitting blockers.

...
  env: 
    AUTH_ENABLED: true
    AUTH_PRESET_USERNAME: username
    AUTH_PRESET_PASSWORD: password
...

^ username/password above are placeholders. I tried AUTH_ENABLED: 1 as well.

still get

Image

Notes

  1. I would guess that the majority of people are going to be installing this headless; assuming headless by default would be advantageous. In particular, to make this easily installable on anyone's Start9, Umbrel or Unraid a clear path to headless operation would be great.
  2. Lifecycle scripts are great, but impeding the ability to deploy sensibly using docker-compose all for a lifecycle management script is probably not the best idea.
  3. Not sure how robust that security measure is, as it can probably be spoofed (I'll let you know because that's my only path forward)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    low priorityThis is something that may be fixed in the future, but there are no immediate plans to do so.security

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions