Skip to content

Resolve Measure 8 and Component 11 data definition and quality issues. #6

@grosscol

Description

@grosscol

Problem

The original definition of C11 is sum(contra_choice != "unknown" & contra_choice == imm_method). That is: count the number of cases where contraception choice was not unknown and contraception choice matched the immediate method.

The problem is that it doesn't account for how the values of the fields have been interpreted by the analyst or abstractors. 90% of the counts for the above definition of C11 also occur in a row where counseling is FALSE. This leads me to believe that the value of "other" was used in the data set when it should be "unknown".

Current Mitigation

The following definition is currently used for C11 to handle the lack of counseling. Which impacts Measure 8:

C11 = sum(counseling & contra_choice != "unknown" & contra_choice == imm_method)

Solution

This needs to be addressed in the following ways:

Definitions

  • The meaning of the contra_choice values needs to be defined.
  • The valid values of contra_choice when counseling is FALSE need to be defined.

Data Corrections

  • A transform for the existing data needs to be approved: e.g. when counseling is FALSE, change value of contra_choice to "unknown".
  • A confirmation that the existing entries of "other" in the imm_method field are correct.

Alternatively: Data could be re-uploaded with conformant use of other in contra_choice and imm_method fields. Effectively fixing the data issue at the source.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions