Skip to content

rename performance gap content to performance comparison content #198

@zachll

Description

@zachll

The term "gap" has been too ambiguous as an indicator of a discrepancy between performance levels.

Proposal: Renaming "performance gap content" and all its subclasses to "performance comparison content"

Proposal: Leave "performance gap content" as an alternate term or and obsoleted term

Notes:

  • Make sure the labels are correct and updated for all performance gap/comparison content classes

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions