Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Is it possible to include a default constructor in QuickPID? Yes. Were you needing something like this?
I would also consider a pull request ... or could just publish this as an update with new version (QuickPID 3.1.4) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Added default constrictor - new version published (QuickPID 3.1.4) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I am developing a project that needs the PID class to be inherited or prototyped, what is not allowed with a class with no default constructor. I am using PID_v1 and I had to modify the library in order to create a default constructor, but I am not comfortable using non-standard libraries. I want my code to be as compatible as possible with the tools available to the community, so people can use my work as I use the work of others.
I thought about creating a branch on PID-v1 and ask for a pull request of my version, but that project is kind of abandoned.
Is it possible to include a default constructor in QuickPID? I would gladly do it myself if I was allowed to create a branch and them request a pull.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions