Full Momentum Coupling between WW3-MPASO-EAM #6475
Closed
erinethomas
started this conversation in
Development discussion
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
@sbrus89 @vanroekel @jonbob - your input would be especially helpful |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
closing discussion here to open a PR on E3SM-Ocean-Discussion |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
NEW WAVE COUPLING FEATURE
Full momentum coupling between WW3, MPAS-Ocean, and EAM is being implemented.
This discussion is for the purpose of getting a preliminary code review and feedback before an official PR is opened into E3SM.
A table summarizing all testing being performed is at the bottom of the page here:
https://acme-climate.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OO/pages/4271702034/2024.Q2+WAVEWATCH+III+maintenance+developments
Suggestions welcome for additional testing that is needed to open a PR into E3SM.
Git Repo:
master...erinethomas:E3SM:WaveMomentum
The use of WW3 is 'stealth' in that WW3 is NOT a standard feature of E3SM. However, the implementation of wave-ocean-atm coupling in this PR defines the default coupling based upon the COMPSET used.
For example, a fully coupled base with active waves (B compset + WW3) will assume full, two-way coupling between WW3-EAM-MPASO and MPAS-SI. (note: limited wave-ice coupling for now, full wave-ice coupling coming soon). On the other hand, if a data atmosphere used, like in a G Case +WW3, EAM-WW3 coupling will default to "one-way" (data winds passed to WW3) while full two way coupling between WW3 and MPAS-O/MPAS-SI.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions