Multiple definitions on classes might cause unintended behaviour

[matentzn]

Since all definitions on the same class become logically equivalent, we might get some strange inferences such as entities that ('s depends on' some 'cell in vitro') are equivalent to ('bearer of' some 'cell morphology phenotype'). IMHO, multiple definitions on the same class should be avoided in general.

http://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000020
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000024
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000027
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000102
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000104
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000150
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000163
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000165
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000166
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000176
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000188
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000194
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000219
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000249
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000283
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000290
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000304
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000306
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000414
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000415
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000427
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000429
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000431