Inquiry About Rayhunter Support for GrapheneOS and Mudi V2 Devices

[apolloracer]

What problem does this feature solve or what does it enhance?

Hello Rayhunter Team,

I’ve been following the Rayhunter project with great interest and appreciate the work you’re doing to bring open-source IMSI-catcher detection to privacy-conscious users.

I wanted to ask if there are any plans to develop a mobile version of Rayhunter that could run directly on GrapheneOS (Pixel phones) or on Android devices in general.

Additionally, I’m curious whether there is any intention to port or adapt Rayhunter for use on the GL.iNet Mudi V2 (GL-E750V2) travel router, which runs OpenWRT and includes LTE modem support. This would greatly extend the utility of the tool for off-grid and mobile users.

I’d love to hear if this kind of support is being considered, or if there are any technical barriers that currently prevent this.

Thank you again for your work in this space. Looking forward to your response

Proposed Solution

Android application/version

Alternatives Considered

No response

[untitaker]

Hi, there are two separate requests here, so I'll move this to the discussion area.

• Regarding android support, this has been considered, but has never been picked up, mostly due to a lack of experience with android development. It would require a rooted phone too.

• Regarding the GL-Inet Mudi V2: It depends on the brand of the LTE modem that is being used here. I see that it uses a qualcomm chip for WiFi. See https://efforg.github.io/rayhunter/supported-devices.html#adding-new-devices.

Like in #479, adding new devices is no problem if there are no technical blockers, and if there is a contributor who will add and maintain it.

if you want somebody else to do the work, you need to make a case for it. This is a bit too vague:

This would greatly extend the utility of the tool for off-grid and mobile users.

Why would I pick this device instead of the other ones we already support? I see the GL-Inet costs 180 EUR while the other devices (Orbic, TP-Link) cost less than half that amount. Is it because of VPN support?