Skip to content

Commit 2ae14ed

Browse files
committed
docs(concept): clarify outcome stereotypes vs use case stereotypes
Corrected the Business Capabilities section to explain Use Case Stereotypes as separate concept. Business Capability is an example of a Use Case Stereotype, not a standalone concept.
1 parent 9edc08b commit 2ae14ed

File tree

1 file changed

+7
-5
lines changed

1 file changed

+7
-5
lines changed

docs/concept/outcome/outcome-stereotype.md

Lines changed: 7 additions & 5 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -148,12 +148,14 @@ story:
148148
- **Success Criteria** — How do we measure story success?
149149
- **Key Results** — What measurable impact should this story have?
150150

151-
### Business Capabilities
151+
### Use Case Stereotypes
152152

153-
Business Capabilities (as modeled in the [Use Case Tree](../use-case-tree.md)) enable outcomes.
154-
Higher-level outcome stereotypes (Goals, Objectives) often drive
155-
capability investment decisions, while lower-level stereotypes (KPIs,
156-
Success Criteria) measure capability performance.
153+
Use Cases can have their own stereotypes (e.g., "Business Capability Area", "Business Capability Domain", "Data Domain"). Different outcome stereotypes may be appropriate at different levels:
154+
155+
- **Goals** may guide entire programs or strategic use cases
156+
- **Objectives** may drive specific use case implementations
157+
- **Success Criteria** and **Definitions of Done** may define use case completion
158+
- **KPIs** may measure ongoing performance of operational use cases
157159

158160
## Best Practices
159161

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)