Standard name for pressure and potential temperature in WRF #109
Unanswered
weiwilliam
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
@weiwilliam I would suggest somewhat different names for greater precision:
This way it is clear the type of perturbation that is being specified, in case other models employ different strategies. I wasn't sure what variable While I did reference section 5.2.2 of the WRF technical guide for these descriptions, I haven't worked with WRF output in a few years, and it's possible the wording could be better, so I welcome any different suggestions. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello all,
I have an application that would like to directly work with WRF output and follow the naming convention, but there are some variables in WRF not described in the standard name convention.
Here is my current consideration for those variables,
Please let me know if you need further information.
Looking forward to have your inputs.
Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions