Dev

[Emasoft]

Description

Related Issue

Fixes #(issue number)

Type of Change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• Documentation update
• Code refactoring
• Performance improvement
• Test coverage improvement

Changes Made

• Change 1
• Change 2
• Change 3

Testing

Test Configuration

• Python version:
• OS:

Test Results

• All existing tests pass
• New tests added for new functionality
• Manual testing performed

Test commands run:

# Example:
uv run pytest

Screenshots / Examples

Before:

<!-- Example output before changes -->

After:

<!-- Example output after changes -->

Checklist

• My code follows the project's code style (passes ruff check and ruff format)
• I have performed a self-review of my code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings or errors
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published

Breaking Changes

Impact:

Migration Guide:

Additional Notes

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 9.06%. Comparing base (044cc6d) to head (7d56970).

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main      #6   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   9.06%   9.06%           
=====================================
  Files          1       1           
  Lines       4161    4161           
  Branches    1165    1165           
=====================================
  Hits         377     377           
  Misses      3783    3783           
  Partials       1       1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[claude]

PR Review: Dev → Main

Summary

This pull request appears to merge the dev branch into main, but currently contains no actual code changes - only merge commits that brought changes from main back into dev:

• 0 files changed
• 0 additions / 0 deletions
• 5 merge commits (all from main → dev)

Issues Identified

🔴 Critical: Wrong Merge Direction

The commits in this PR are all merging main INTO dev, but the PR itself is trying to merge dev INTO main. This creates a circular merge pattern with no actual changes to merge.

Commits in PR:

1. "Merge main into dev - Add release pipeline automation"
2. "Merge main: Disable CI on dev/testing + add branch workflow docs"
3. "Merge main: Remove auto-version bumping from build commands"
4. "Merge main: Add channel-specific install commands and remove version …"
5. "Merge main: Track dist/ wheels in each branch"

🟡 PR Template Not Completed

The PR description uses the template but none of the sections have been filled out:

• Type of Change - not marked
• Changes Made - placeholder text only
• Testing - no test results provided
• Checklist - all items unchecked
• No description of what this PR accomplishes

Recommendations

Option 1: Close This PR (Recommended)

Since there are no changes to merge and all commits are from main→dev, this PR serves no purpose and should be closed. The dev branch is now synchronized with main.

Option 2: If There Are Intended Changes

If this PR was meant to include actual development work from the dev branch:

1. Add the actual feature/fix commits to the dev branch

2. Complete the PR template with:

   • Clear description of changes
   • Type of change (feature/bugfix/etc.)
   • Testing performed and results
   • Screenshots/examples if applicable

3. Run pre-commit checks per PR-CHECKLIST.md:

   ruff format
   ruff check --fix
   trufflehog git file://. --since-commit origin/main --branch HEAD --results=verified,unknown

4. Ensure proper commit message format per CONTRIBUTING.md:

   <type>: <subject>
   
   <body>
   
   <footer>
   

Branch Workflow Clarification

For future reference, the typical workflow should be:

1. Create feature branches from main
2. Develop features in the branch
3. Merge main into feature branch to stay current (if needed)
4. When complete, merge feature branch → main (with actual changes)
5. Delete feature branch after merge

Current state: The dev branch is synchronized with main and ready for development work.

Conclusion

Recommendation: Close this PR as it contains no changes to merge. If development work is planned for the dev branch, add those changes first, then create a new PR with a properly completed description.

---

Review generated based on CONTRIBUTING.md and PR-CHECKLIST.md guidelines.

[Emasoft]

Closing outdated PR. Branch has been synced with main directly.

[claude]

Pull Request Review - PR #6: Dev

Summary

This PR attempts to merge the dev branch into main. However, upon review, this PR contains no actual changes (0 additions, 0 deletions, 0 files changed). All commits in this PR are merge commits from main into dev, creating a circular merge pattern without any new development work.

Critical Issues

1. Empty PR / No Changes

• Severity: High
• Issue: This PR shows 0 files changed with 0 additions and 0 deletions
• Impact: Merging this PR would create unnecessary merge commits without adding value
• Recommendation: Close this PR unless there are intended changes that haven't been pushed yet

2. PR Template Not Completed

• Severity: Medium
• Issue: The PR description contains only the template without any actual information filled in
• Missing Information:
  • Description of changes
  • Related issue number
  • Type of change checkboxes
  • List of changes made
  • Testing details (Python version, OS, test results)
  • Checklist items
• Recommendation: Complete all required sections of the PR template as specified in PR-CHECKLIST.md

3. Reverse Merge Pattern

• Severity: Medium
• Issue: The commit history shows multiple "Merge main into dev" commits, suggesting the dev branch is being kept in sync with main but contains no actual development work
• Commits:
  • Merge main into dev - Add release pipeline automation
  • Merge main: Disable CI on dev/testing + add branch workflow docs
  • Merge main: Remove auto-version bumping from build commands
  • Merge main: Add channel-specific install commands...
  • Merge main: Track dist/ wheels in each branch
  • Merge branch 'main' into dev
• Expected Pattern: Development work should happen on dev, then be merged to main when ready
• Recommendation: Only create PRs from dev to main when the dev branch contains actual new features, fixes, or improvements

PR Checklist Compliance

Based on PR-CHECKLIST.md, the following items should be verified:

• ruff format and ruff check --fix run
• TruffleHog scan completed (no verified secrets)
• Line length ≤ 88 characters (E501)
• Unused loop variables prefixed with _ (B007)

Status: Cannot verify - no code changes to check

Code Quality Assessment

Not Applicable - No code changes to review

Security Review

Not Applicable - No code changes to review

However, note that based on the repository's security practices (from CONTRIBUTING.md):

• Pre-commit hooks should be installed and running
• TruffleHog scanning should be active
• No secrets should be committed

Test Coverage

Not Applicable - No code changes requiring tests

Performance Considerations

Not Applicable - No code changes to evaluate

Recommendations

Immediate Actions

1. Close or Update This PR

   • If this PR was created by mistake, close it
   • If there are intended changes, push them to the dev branch before requesting review
   • If the goal is to sync branches, this can be done locally without a PR

2. Complete the PR Template

   • Fill in all required sections before requesting review
   • Provide clear description of what changes are intended
   • Link to related issues
   • Document testing performed

3. Follow Proper Branch Workflow

   • Keep dev for active development
   • Only merge dev → main when there are completed features/fixes
   • Avoid creating empty merge PRs

Best Practices for Future PRs

1. Atomic Changes

   • Each PR should contain focused, related changes
   • Include actual code modifications, not just merge commits

2. Documentation

   • Complete all PR template sections
   • Provide context and rationale for changes
   • Reference related issues

3. Testing

   • Run all tests before creating PR
   • Document test results in PR description
   • Add new tests for new functionality

4. Pre-submission Checks (from PR-CHECKLIST.md)

   ruff format
   ruff check --fix
   trufflehog git file://. --since-commit origin/main --branch HEAD --results=verified,unknown

Conclusion

Recommendation: Close this PR unless there are intended changes that need to be pushed to the dev branch.

If development work is planned for the dev branch:

1. Make the actual code changes
2. Run all pre-commit checks
3. Update this PR description with completed template
4. Request review again

The current state of this PR does not align with the contribution guidelines in CONTRIBUTING.md and PR-CHECKLIST.md, as it contains no reviewable changes and an incomplete description.

---

Review performed following project guidelines from CONTRIBUTING.md and PR-CHECKLIST.md