Skip to content

Read-your-writes consistency #173

@neoword

Description

@neoword

Desired Behavior

  • Mutations should "wait" until their side-effects are realized in underlying data store before returning to the caller
  • This approximates "read-your-writes"
  • There should be a timeout that fails if "read-your-write" condition is not met by the timeout

Benefits

  • Builds more quickly
  • Builds are more reliable
  • Hacks are not in place to ensure side-effects are propagated

See this as an example:

https://github.com/homeaway/hello-streams/blob/8fb25229513a26d61ea94952d1d0fa7f902703f2/order-processor/src/main/java/com/homeaway/streamplatform/hellostreams/orderprocessor/dao/OrderDao.java#L105-L106

and this:

https://github.com/homeaway/hello-streams/blob/8fb25229513a26d61ea94952d1d0fa7f902703f2/order-processor/src/main/java/com/homeaway/streamplatform/hellostreams/orderprocessor/dao/OrderDao.java#L72-L82

Would ideally want a completely consumer-based interaction as opposed to polling, but polling can be a good first start.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions