Import vrf and route-map issue #19501
Unanswered
josh-yangcching
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
I also tried the version: 8.1 with the same config. Here is the output which have two path for the same route. The result is different from testing with version: 10.4.1. I found that there is a PR: #9610, which may let route check from vrf parent. The question is that if there is also config "import vf route-map", which behavior is correct? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I am using frr 10.4.1 to config as the following topology. The question is that why there is only one path instead of two path in output of "show ipv6 route vrf vrf-blue" in node "frr-10.4.1-3". But there are two paths from the output of "show bgp vrf vrf-blue 2a02:6bf:8009:ff06::/64". It looks like that it used path from vrf-red instead of route-map results.
expected result:
there are two paths in output of "show ipv6 route vrf vrf-blue" which is the same as output of "show bgp vrf vrf-blue 2a02:6bf:8009:ff06::/64"
the topology:
the config
ip conifg:
frr config
ip conifg:
frr config
ip conifg:
frr config
ip conifg:
frr config
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions