(yaml) Possible performance regression in snakeyaml 1.18

[tlrx]

Hi,

I spotted a performance regression in snakeyaml introduced in version 1.18+. This issue has been reported on the snakeyaml mailing list here and seems to affect the parsing of large text values.

It affects jackson-dataformats-text starting version 2.9.1 as it depends on snakeyaml 1.18. Version 1.19 is also problematic but version 1.17 is ok.

I understand that this is not a jackson-dataformats-text issue but I'd like 1) to raise awareness on this regression and 2) to ensure that jackson-dataformats-text dependency on snakeyaml will be updated to a newer version that fixes the regression (if such version is released)

[cowtowncoder]

Ok. Thank you for reporting this. I don't remember if 1.18 was specifically needed for a bug fix or not. If not, could gracefully downgrade until 1.20 (or whatever with fix) comes along.

It is too bad SnakeYAML has severe performance issues in general (it's literally 10-20x slower than, say, json parsing, or 10x xml); otherwise it works very well.

[chrisco484]

"10x [slower than] xml [parsing]?"

With XML being so verbose it's hard to imagine anything being slower than XML parsing. That's amazing.

[cowtowncoder]

@chrisco484 there is no fundamental reason it should be, since at low level textual codecs really should converge to similar speeds relative to raw size (that is, more verbose formats would be bit slower just since there's more text to decode). On the other hand, XML parsers have been rather aggressively optimized so parsers like Aalto get pretty decent throughput, in 10s of megabytes per second per core. It would be nice if YAML part could be improved.

[chrisco484]

Yes, I guess the XML world has had 20 years to optimize whereas YAML is relatively recent in its ever growing adoption. The theoretical max speed of any YAML parser should be quicker than the theoretical max speed of any XML parser given YAML doesn't have the verbosity of XML but, as you say, the difference may not be large - but still would be noticeable on larger data sets I would think.

…

________________________________ From: Tatu Saloranta [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Thursday, 5 April 2018 8:42 AM To: FasterXML/jackson-dataformats-text Cc: Chris Colman; Mention Subject: Re: [FasterXML/jackson-dataformats-text] (yaml) Possible performance regression in snakeyaml 1.18 (#67) @chrisco484 <https://github.com/chrisco484> there is no fundamental reason it should be, since at low level textual codecs really should converge to similar speeds relative to raw size (that is, more verbose formats would be bit slower just since there's more text to decode). On the other hand, XML parsers have been rather aggressively optimized so parsers like Aalto get pretty decent throughput, in 10s of megabytes per second per core. It would be nice if YAML part could be improved. - You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#67 (comment) mment-378767743> , or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA6iPxUcSd1hM5VyfzHiW 9ZaqcT6l6JLks5tlUwcgaJpZM4R3EVP> . <https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AA6iP62050QDKvbGURyVhfEvhZIs3MK Zks5tlUwcgaJpZM4R3EVP.gif>

[cowtowncoder]

Right. And one problem with YAML is that the rules for decoding are rather complicated (specification is huge, and with all the variations to support wiki-style, or not, it gets hairy quick), which makes it much more work to optimize.
But I don't think that's where most of the time is spent right now: I think it's just SnakeYAML using quite complex processing pipeline.

As long as YAML is mostly used for configuration handling this isn't much of a problem.
But it could be a problem for anyone using YAML for data interchange (request/response).

[chrisco484]

yeah, i was thinking of using it for data integration/migration because of Yaml's smaller serialised output.

…

________________________________ From: Tatu Saloranta [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Thursday, 5 April 2018 12:59 PM To: FasterXML/jackson-dataformats-text Cc: Chris Colman; Mention Subject: Re: [FasterXML/jackson-dataformats-text] (yaml) Possible performance regression in snakeyaml 1.18 (#67) Right. And one problem with YAML is that the rules for decoding are rather complicated (specification is huge, and with all the variations to support wiki-style, or not, it gets hairy quick), which makes it much more work to optimize. But I don't think that's where most of the time is spent right now: I think it's just SnakeYAML using quite complex processing pipeline. As long as YAML is mostly used for configuration handling this isn't much of a problem. But it could be a problem for anyone using YAML for data interchange (request/response). - You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#67 (comment) mment-378806463> , or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA6iP6u8pz8JDh3EY4fq4 6JSCKrdKrr8ks5tlYh1gaJpZM4R3EVP> . <https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AA6iP1KaINMBPNTXCEL1O9wp7xveA_A kks5tlYh1gaJpZM4R3EVP.gif>

[cowtowncoder]

@tlrx Looks like 1.20 is out. Not sure if that differs from 1.19 in this aspect; based on discussion it sounds like probably not?

[yborovikov]

fyi: snakeyaml 1.20 introduced a breaking (for jackson 2.9.5) change in this commit https://bitbucket.org/asomov/snakeyaml/commits/6cb855839ebc1f3796cff26aa6e5423f1395b975.

java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.yaml.snakeyaml.events.MappingStartEvent.<init>(Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;ZLorg/yaml/snakeyaml/error/Mark;Lorg/yaml/snakeyaml/error/Mark;Ljava/lang/Boolean;)V

    at com.fasterxml.jackson.dataformat.yaml.YAMLGenerator.writeStartObject(YAMLGenerator.java:489)
    at com.fasterxml.jackson.core.base.GeneratorBase.writeStartObject(GeneratorBase.java:286)
    at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.std.MapSerializer.serialize(MapSerializer.java:626)
    at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.std.MapSerializer.serialize(MapSerializer.java:33)
    at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.DefaultSerializerProvider._serialize(DefaultSerializerProvider.java:480)
    at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.DefaultSerializerProvider.serializeValue(DefaultSerializerProvider.java:319)
    at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper._configAndWriteValue(ObjectMapper.java:3893)
    at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper.writeValueAsString(ObjectMapper.java:3207)
    ...

cc: @asomov

[40ft]

I just ran into this performance problem (parsing a 30KB string on Android) and spent a couple of hours looking at the snakeyaml code, before finding my way here.

The main problem in 1.18 is a O(n-squared) loop in the Reader.peek() function, which has indeed been completely rewritten and fixed in later versions. Forcing snakeyaml to 1.21 (with jackson 2.9.5) in my build gives acceptable parsing performance on Android. It does break serialization though, as mentioned above.

Generally speaking, there is a lot of seemingly unnecessary string buffering/duplication/copying going on in the snakeyaml parsing code (optimisation is hard!), so I am not at all surprised if performance is bad.

[asomov]

@chrisco484 : the YAML 1.2 spec is very big. Chomping, flow styles, scalar styles (especially the folded style), implicit types, anchors/aliases/recursive structures, complex keys are not present in XML and they are not often used. Nevertheless the parser must always take care of all these details.

[asomov]

@yborovikov: can I help to adapt jackson 2.9.5 to work with SnakeYAML 1.21 ?

[cowtowncoder]

Quick note: next patch version would be 2.9.6, but I have decided that there probably should be minor upgrade of 2.10 for Jackson, before bigger changes in 3.0.

I have no objections to changes in 2.9(.6) that allow use of newer version (and dependency to newer version), as long as change would still work with older version(s) that Jackson 2.9 has relied on.
This because users sometimes have slightly inconsistent set of dependencies, and I don't want to add risk in patch versions.

For 2.10, new version should definitely be used, so above caveat is only wrt 2.9.x patches.