JsonValue set in value class does not work

[k163377]

Describe the bug
SSIA

This issue is related to #199 .

To Reproduce

import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonValue
import com.fasterxml.jackson.module.kotlin.jacksonMapperBuilder
import org.junit.Test
import kotlin.test.assertEquals

class GitHubXXX {
    // At the moment, the output is the same with or without `JsonValue`,
    // but this pattern is included in the test case in case the option to default to a serialization method that
    // does not `unbox` is introduced in the future.
    @JvmInline value class Foo(@get:JsonValue val value: Int)

    @JvmInline value class Bar(val value: Int) {
        @get:JsonValue val jsonValue: String get() = this.toString()
    }

    interface JsonValueGetter { @get:JsonValue val jsonValue: String get() = this.toString() }
    @JvmInline value class Baz(val value: Int): JsonValueGetter

    @JvmInline value class Qux(val value: Int): JsonValueGetter

    @JvmInline value class Corge(val value: Int) {
        @get:JsonValue val jsonValue: String get() = this.toString()
    }

    data class Data<T : Any>(
        val foo1: Foo,
        val foo2: Foo?,
        val bar1: Bar,
        val bar2: Bar?,
        val baz1: Baz,
        val baz2: Baz?,
        val qux1: JsonValueGetter,
        val qux2: JsonValueGetter?,
        val corge1: T,
        val corge2: T?
    )

    @Test
    fun test() {
        val writer = jacksonMapperBuilder().build().writerWithDefaultPrettyPrinter()

        assertEquals(
            """
                {
                  "foo1" : 1,
                  "foo2" : 2,
                  "bar1" : "Bar(value=3)",
                  "bar2" : "Bar(value=4)",
                  "baz1" : "Baz(value=5)",
                  "baz2" : "Baz(value=6)",
                  "qux1" : "Qux(value=7)",
                  "qux2" : "Qux(value=8)",
                  "corge1" : "Corge(value=9)",
                  "corge2" : "Corge(value=10)"
                }
            """.trimIndent(),
            writer.writeValueAsString(
                Data(
                    Foo(1), Foo(2),
                    Bar(3), Bar(4),
                    Baz(5), Baz(6),
                    Qux(7), Qux(8),
                    Corge(9), Corge(10)
                )
            )
        )
    }
}

At the moment, actual as follows.

{
  "foo1" : 1,
  "foo2" : 2,
  "bar1" : 3,
  "bar2" : 4,
  "baz1" : 5,
  "baz2" : 6,
  "qux1" : 7,
  "qux2" : 8,
  "corge1" : 9,
  "corge2" : 10
}

Versions
This commit: 9cd05ee

Additional context
I am going to fix this problem myself.
I would appreciate it if you could point out any omissions in the test cases.

[dinomite]

Probably makes sense to merge after #512

[dinomite]

(meant that comment for #531)