Jam specific clients

[kumyoung]

Helloo every one..Can i request? On Captive Portal attack the jamming is all client, can i request to have
a selection? 1 client or 2, 3, all or to select mac of a client to jam? not all client so that not obviously hack
:)

[M1z23R]

I’ve never tried deauthing specific client, only specific AP on specific channel.

[MPX4132]

It’s possible, I’ve done it before while running tests. When I was writing v3 I was implementing that feature, but when I noticed the original fluxion didn’t have it I stopped.

[kumyoung]

I hope the original fluxion can have a specific user jam for portal attacks..

[M1z23R]

My mistake, it's possible using aircrack instead of mdk3, i am used to mdk3 so i didn't realize i once tried aircrack for this purpuse. @MPX4132 Already marked this topic as Enhancement so it will be added eventually.

[kumyoung]

I've done specific user jam by executing aireplay-ng... On captive portal attack is on going i close the Jamming window then open another terminal window execute airudump-ng monitor the AP client you want to hack then open another terminal window and execute aireplay-ng select specific client to jam ;) aireplay-ng -0 0 -a 00:0F:66:XX:XX:XX -c 00:0F:70:XX:XX:XX wlan0

[kumyoung]

Sorry i mean airodump-ng

[Midas101]

Hi!
is it possible to block a pc with mac address to connect to the wrong AP?
thnks

[rodrigogs]

+1

Maybe it should decrease router's channel change rate due to too many deauth packages being sent.

[MPX4132]

@rodrigogs I've already tweaked the deauthentication time, from constant on, to 3 seconds of deauthentication and 7 of downtime, or something like that. The fact is all devices differ in their behavior. Some devices connect super slowly, some access points take their sweet time processing a connection request. Some freak out when they detect all the clients disconnecting and correlate that to heavy traffic or something and change channels. It's really trial-and-error when it comes to deauthentication.

[voltaire1694]

Dumb question: what would be the advantage of jamming a specific client on a target AP, while leaving the others undisturbed?

[MPX4132]

@voltaire1694 I think jamming a specific client could be a type of "spear phishing." Target the least tech savvy users, since they're the ones less likely to suspect of a potential intrusion.

That's the only thing I can think of and why I didn't close this feature request.