Skip to content

TLS_EMPTY_RENEGOTIATION_INFO_SCSV was ignored again #41

@HanadaLee

Description

@HanadaLee

#27 resolves the issue of missing TLS_EMPTY_RENEGOTIATION_INFO_SCSV.

but #38 The changes appear to have caused the problem to resurface.

wireshark:
[JA4: t13d3112h1_e8f1e7e78f70_b26ce05bbdd6]
[JA4_r […]: t13d3112h1_002f,0033,0035,0039,003c,003d,0067,006b,009c,009d,009e,009f,00ff,1301,1302,1303,c009,c00a,c013,c014,c023,c024,c027,c028,c02b,c02c,c02f,c030,cca8,cca9,ccaa_000a,000b,000d,0015,0016,0017,002b,002d,0031,0033_0403,0503,]
Image
Image

nginx:
< ja4: t13d3012h1_1d37bd780c83_b26ce05bbdd6
< ja4r: t13d3012ht_002f,0033,0035,0039,003c,003d,0067,006b,009c,009d,009e,009f,1301,1302,1303,c009,c00a,c013,c014,c023,c024,c027,c028,c02b,c02c,c02f,c030,cca8,cca9,ccaa_000a,000b,000d,0015,0016,0017,002b,002d,0031,0033_0403,0503,0603,0807,0808,0809,080a,080b,0804,0805,0806,0401,0501,0601,0303,0301,0302,0402,0502,0602
Image

Based on the discussion in FoxIO-LLC/ja4#184, ja4 should compute TLS_EMPTY_RENEGOTIATION_INFO_SCSV, but since openssl filters this function, should we revert to using a custom function for this?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions