Skip to content

Different SEACR peak calling results between IgG and 2ndAbOnly (negative controls) #88

@jqiu1

Description

@jqiu1

Hi all,

I called peaks using SEACR with IgG and 2nd antibody_only as negative controls. It works fine for other proteins of interest except for p300, and the SEACR results are not consistent.

When I used IgG as a negative control (norm, relaxed), much more peaks were called, but the max signal is very low. However, when I used 2ndAbOnly as a negative control (norm, relaxed), much less peaks were called, and the max signal is much higher (at least 10 fold). I am attaching the screenshots of SEACR output bed files for IgG, 2ndAbOnly in the email for the reference. I would appreciate if you could help with it.

p300_IgG

p300_2nAbOnly

Thank you in advance for your help!

Thanks,
Jingyun

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions