Does FreeTDS ODBC driver should be maintained continually?

[taozuhong]

Microsoft SQL Server ODBC driver has been landed on Linux and macOS, so I have a question:

Does FreeTDS ODBC driver should be maintained continually?

Maybe FreeTDS should drop the ODBC support, focus on the light-weight library for SQL Server(libtds), and wrapper its api as ct-lib and db-lib.

[freddy77]

ODBC library is the only library getting additional improvement, lot of usages of ctlib/dblib came from porting. Adding extensions to ctlib/dblib is doable and done but possibly limiting. Also the world is not all Windows, Linux and MacOS and as far as I know Microsoft driver is not open source.

[taozuhong]

Ah, if missing ODBC driver, we have JDBC and ADBC, or access via libtds directly, so focus on libtds and its porting library(ctlib/dblib) or just libtds only, it seems that is the right choice.

Maybe FreeTDS could split into three projects: libtds / libtdssql(ctlib/dblib) / libtdsodbc, libtds is the core engine, focus on making it powerful, portable and stable, it will release more power.

We have limited energy, so focus on what is most valuable（libtds).

[mmcnabb-vms]

I am using FreeTDS & unixODBC, on a platform which is not Linux, MacOS or Windows