Update STRANDLOCK_PROTOCOL.md

chadsec1 · web-flow · commit 3c21ff0c3d96 · 2025-11-03T15:22:27.000+02:00
diff --git a/STRANDLOCK_PROTOCOL.md b/STRANDLOCK_PROTOCOL.md
@@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ Using raw entropy does not guarantee it is uniform. As `CSPRNG` entropy is usual
 The reason we use SHA3_512 specifically, and truncate to size we need, is actually 3 separate reasons:
 - Less code is called: Depending on one hashing algorithm, means we have to call less code with potentinally untrusted input. 
 - `SHA3_512` internal state can store more entropy than for instance `SHA3_256`.
-- `SHA3` in general, is proven to be better resistant to `Shor's` algorithm, which makes it better long-term than (for instance) `SHA2`.
+- `SHA3` in general, is proven to be better resistant to `Groover's` algorithm, which makes it better long-term than (for instance) `SHA2`.
 - 
 
 **Question**

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
@@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ Using raw entropy does not guarantee it is uniform. As `CSPRNG` entropy is usual
`582`	`582`	`The reason we use SHA3_512 specifically, and truncate to size we need, is actually 3 separate reasons:`
`583`	`583`	`- Less code is called: Depending on one hashing algorithm, means we have to call less code with potentinally untrusted input.`
`584`	`584`	- `SHA3_512` internal state can store more entropy than for instance `SHA3_256`.
`585`		-- `SHA3` in general, is proven to be better resistant to `Shor's` algorithm, which makes it better long-term than (for instance) `SHA2`.
	`585`	+- `SHA3` in general, is proven to be better resistant to `Groover's` algorithm, which makes it better long-term than (for instance) `SHA2`.
`586`	`586`	`-`
`587`	`587`
`588`	`588`	`Question`