You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This addresses one of the points raised in the Forum issue
https://forum.generic-mapping-tools.org/t/colour-scheme-without-outline/5967
Now we can do `psscale -Dx6.5/1+w340p/36p+h -B+n -Ccyclic > cyclic.ps` and have no frames at all.
I would like also that `-B0` did that work (a nicer syntax, IMO) and in fact, this PR also implements it but it requires that GMT is built with `-DB0_IS_NO_FRAME`. The reason for wrapping it in a `#ifdef` is that changing `-B0` to do what it originally should have been since the beginning (that is, to DO NOT PLOT ANY FRAME, ANNOTS AT ALL) is a breaking change. I would like, however, to discuss if we should do it nevertheless.
Co-authored-by: Federico Esteban <[email protected]>
else { /* When no -B we annotate every CPT bound which may be non-equidistant, hence this code (i.e., we cannot fake a call to -B) */
1413
+
elseif (!GMT->current.map.frame.no_frame) { /* When no -B we annotate every CPT bound which may be non-equidistant, hence this code (i.e., we cannot fake a call to -B) */
1410
1414
1411
1415
if (!skip_lines) { /* First draw gridlines, unless skip_lines is true */
0 commit comments