Add gqa filter param to composites cli (#132)

* add gqa filter param to composites cli

add gqa filter param to composites cli
Allows turning on and off the gqa filter when loading data for tidal composites.

* Automatically update integration test validation results

Author: vnewey

intertidal/composites.py

@@ -335,11 +335,19 @@ def tidal_composites(
     "(e.g. < 20) often correspond with sunglint. Defaults to 20, "
     "which will mask all pixels with a glint angle of less than 20.",
 )
+@click.option(
+    "--gqa_filter/--no-gqa_filter",
+    type=bool,
+    default=True,
+    help="Whether to filter scenes when loading data based on gqa values. "
+    "Defaults to True",
+)
 @click.option(
     "--include_coastal_aerosol/--no-include_coastal_aerosol",
     type=bool,
     default=True,
-    help="Whether to include the coastal aerosol band",
+    help="Whether to include the coastal aerosol band. "
+    "Defaults to True",
 )
 @click.option(
     "--eps",
@@ -404,6 +412,7 @@ def tidal_composites_cli(
     threshold_hightide,
     min_obs,
     mask_sunglint,
+    gqa_filter,
     include_coastal_aerosol,
     eps,
     cpus,
@@ -463,7 +472,7 @@ def tidal_composites_cli(
                 crs="EPSG:3577",
                 include_s2=True,
                 include_ls=False,
-                filter_gqa=True,
+                filter_gqa=gqa_filter,
                 ndwi=False,
                 mask_sunglint=mask_sunglint,
                 include_coastal_aerosol=include_coastal_aerosol,

tests/README.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Integration tests
 
 This directory contains tests that are run to verify that DEA Intertidal code runs correctly. The ``test_intertidal.py`` file runs a small-scale full workflow analysis over an intertidal flat in the Gulf of Carpentaria using the DEA Intertidal [Command Line Interface (CLI) tools](../notebooks/Intertidal_CLI.ipynb), and compares these results against a LiDAR validation DEM to produce some simple accuracy metrics.
 
-The latest integration test completed at **2025-04-28 16:23**. Compared to the previous run, it had an:
+The latest integration test completed at **2025-05-02 11:43**. Compared to the previous run, it had an:
 - RMSE accuracy of **0.14 m ( :heavy_minus_sign: no change)**
 - MAE accuracy of **0.12 m ( :heavy_minus_sign: no change)**
 - Bias of **0.12 m ( :heavy_minus_sign: no change)**

tests/validation.csv

@@ -107,3 +107,4 @@ time,Correlation,RMSE,MAE,R-squared,Bias,Regression slope
 2025-04-28 01:32:00.287768+00:00,0.975,0.145,0.123,0.95,0.117,1.119
 2025-04-28 02:09:27.190062+00:00,0.975,0.145,0.123,0.95,0.117,1.119
 2025-04-28 06:23:57.332550+00:00,0.975,0.145,0.123,0.95,0.117,1.119
+2025-05-02 01:43:13.002005+00:00,0.975,0.145,0.123,0.95,0.117,1.119