-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
Patterns Backlog Review ‐ November 2024
LiyaMath edited this page Nov 14, 2024
·
13 revisions
| Pending Issues | Existing Category | New category | Overlapping with existing | Suggestions | Future Action | Action | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Design Category for coding patterns | No | maybe | Yes | Coding practices are compiler specific | Maybe find the best practices of languages to see if they can be correlated with SCI | Close | |
| Using Complied Languages rather than Interpreted Languages | No | maybe | Yes | Coding practices are compiler specific | Maybe find the best practices of languages to see if they can be correlated with SCI | Close | |
| Automatically scaledown K8s clusters | Cloud | No | Yes | NA | NA | Close | |
| Azure well architected Framework patterns | Yes | Yes | No | Intresting and can be put in different categories | NA | Take up | |
| Specify Pattern Reading Persona(s) | No | No | No | No | Can consider the idea of persona based patterns while restructuring | Take up if restructuring patterns is picked up | |
| Collaboration with W3C web patterns | Yes | Yes | NA | NA | Uplift-Check possibility | Take | |
| Add uglify pattern | Web | No | No | Interesting pattern idea, could be integrated with a guide on how to do that --> And do we have real evidence that it will bring improvement? | NA | Take after restructuring | |
| Green Software Design Resource | No | Yes | No | NA | NA | Take when restructuring | |
| Patterns Use Case Microsoft & DOW | No | No | No | We should discuss, how we want to handel Use Cases and how we want to present them | Discuss this in a meeting | Take after restructuring? (or should we look into use cases before restructuring | |
| Multi-level caching in Web | Web/Cloud | No | No | Have a look, when creating a concept on new structure of patterns | NA | Take when restructuring | |
| Adopter: Mastercard | No | No | No | We have to look into, how others took our patterns and what did they do, to make them better for themself | NA | Take when restructuring | |
| Graduation of Patterns v1 | No | No | No | We should definitely look into that, maybe even before restructuring it. | Graduate the project so that we have v1 approved | Take before restructuring | |
| Example architectures | No | No | No | Look into that when creating concept of structure for patterns | NA | Take when restructuring | |
| Integrate Energy Efficient Machine Learning patterns from academia into AI section | AI | No | No | Intresting pattern idea might need to look into possible association with SCI | NA | Take when restructuring | |
| For Data Compression use ZTSD instead of gzip | NA (maybe cloud but not really) | No | Yes | Can be absorbed into the existing pattern for compressing data | NA | Take while restructuring | |
| "Right-sizing" Kubernetes Instances | In cloud | No | Yes | Can be absorbed into the existing pattern | Do we need a section for k8s patterns, it not really all Cloud | Close | |
| Add additional description field | NA | NA | NA | Shown as ongoing, looks like done | Look to see if all task related to this is done |
graph TD;
A[Patterns]
A-->B[Compiler Specific]
A-->C[Cloud]
A-->D[Web]
A-->E[AI]
A-->F[Uncategorized]
B-->G[Design Category for coding patterns]
B-->H[Using Complied Languages rather than Interpreted Languages]
C-->I[Automatically scaledown K8s clusters]
C-->J[Azure well architected Framework patterns]
C-->K[Multi-level caching in Web]
C-->L[For Data Compression use ZTSD instead of gzip]
C-->M["Right-sizing" Kubernetes Instances]
D-->N[Add uglify pattern]
D-->O[Collaboration with W3C web patterns]
E-->P[Integrate Energy Efficient Machine Learning patterns from academia into AI section]
F-->Q[Green Software Design Resource]
F-->R[Patterns Use Case Microsoft & DOW]
F-->S[Specify Pattern Reading Persona(s)]
F-->T[Adopter: Mastercard]
F-->U[Graduation of Patterns v1]
F-->V[Example architectures]
F-->W[Add additional description field]