What Scope? (1/2/3) #58
will-iamalpine
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
@buchananwp I think maybe we need to eschew the pre-existing scoping given our consequentialist approach? cc @jawache |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
It looks like we've got to scope this (heh) and fit the SCI within standard scope 1/2/3 methodologies. Flagging this to revisit
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions