Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

thats correct. We are working on making this part of a standard ArchR workflow as well but that will take a while due to limited bandwidth.

however, differential accessibility testing is already possible using a different (non-pseudobulk) workflow via getMarkerFeatures(). This is detailed in the manual.
https://www.archrproject.com/bookdown/pairwise-testing-between-groups.html

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by mitchTwoTimes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants