scRNA snATAC Multiome10x #1583
Unanswered
matteozoia4
asked this question in
Questions / Documentation
Replies: 3 comments 10 replies
-
It is unclear what you mean by "integration". Either way, my opinion is that one should always QC on both. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Dear rcorces, sorry for not being clear enough.
Best regards and thank you for your time, MZ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
10 replies
-
Dear Ryan,
I would like to plot linked gene expression with TFs on the UMAP embedding.
```
markerRNA <- getFeatures(myProj, select = paste(motifs, collapse="|"), useMatrix = "GeneIntegrationMatrix")
markerRNA
p <- plotEmbedding(
ArchRProj = myProj,
colorBy = "GeneIntegrationMatrix",
name = sort(markerRNA),
embedding = "IterativeLSI",
continuousSet = "blueYellow",
imputeWeights = getImputeWeights(myProj)
)
```
Using true Multiome-10x data I found myself in the situation where I don't possess a "groupRNA" parameter, this when trying to produce addGeneIntegrationMatrix().
```
myProj <- addGeneIntegrationMatrix(
ArchRProj = myProj,
useMatrix = "GeneScoreMatrix",
matrixName = "GeneIntegrationMatrix",
reducedDims = "IterativeLSI",
seRNA = seRNA,
groupATAC = "Clusters",
groupRNA = "....",
groupList = NULL,
sampleCellsATAC = 10000,
sampleCellsRNA = 10000,
embeddingATAC = NULL,
embeddingRNA = NULL,
dimsToUse = 1:50,
scaleDims = NULL,
corCutOff = 0.75,
plotUMAP = TRUE,
UMAPParams = list(n_neighbors = 40, min_dist = 0.4, metric = "cosine", verbose =
FALSE),
nGenes = 2000,
useImputation = TRUE,
reduction = "cca",
addToArrow = TRUE,
scaleTo = 10000,
genesUse = NULL,
nameCell = "predictedCell",
nameGroup = "predictedGroup",
nameScore = "predictedScore",
transferParams = list(),
threads = getArchRThreads(),
verbose = TRUE,
force = TRUE,
logFile = createLogFile("addGeneIntegrationMatrix")
)
```
Best regards and thank you,
MZ
…________________________________
Da: Ryan Corces ***@***.***>
Inviato: giovedì, 25. agosto 2022 15:26:16
A: GreenleafLab/ArchR
Cc: Zoia, Matteo (DBMR); Author
Oggetto: Re: [GreenleafLab/ArchR] scRNA snATAC integration : What is the best approach for QC and UMAPs production? (Discussion #1583)
Cross-platform linkage of scATAC-seq cells with scRNA-seq cells
(https://www.archrproject.com/bookdown/cross-platform-linkage-of-scatac-seq-cells-with-scrna-seq-cells.html)
This is used when scATAC and scRNA data are acquired separately, not on the same exact cells
Combine snATACseq with scRNAseq and meta.data files
(https://greenleaflab.github.io/ArchR_2020/Ex-Analyze-Multiome.html)
This is used for true multiomic data where scATAC and scRNA are acquired simultaneously in the same single cells using the 10x Multiome kit.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1583 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AUBHT3FQ5QNF2UE7BUJBE2TV25X7RANCNFSM57LCZLPQ>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Dear all,
I am new in ArchR and I would like to know whether the best approach to QCfilter RNA and ATAC experiments together is :
a) QC ATACseq sample, plot the UMAP and integrate the RNAseq ?
b) QC on ATAC and RNA, plot the weighted UMAP ?
Many thanks for your help!
MZ
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions