How to determine statistically significant marker peak across batches? #1602
Unanswered
Zhongjiacheng1
asked this question in
Questions / Documentation
Replies: 1 comment 4 replies
-
Hi @rcorces, I have a similar question, does it make sense to use a categorical variable such as, as.numeric("batch") in the "bias" parameter of getMarkerFeatures? I assume it would match each cell in the "useGroups" with "bgdGroups" based on the batch it is coming from which could presumably avoid effects due to batch differences. Does it make sense? I tried to understand the code but it was a bit difficult for me to follow. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Greetings, dear developers
I wondered whether it is possible to incorporate batch effect information into a regression framework when identifying differentially accessible peaks.
e.g. In Seurat, one may use "orig.ident" as a latent variable in findmarker function to regress out the batch effect and determine differential gene expression.
It seems to me that, the "bias" parameter in "getMarkerFeatures" could do the trick, but I am not sure.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions