Why positive TF doesn't correlate with footprint? #1637
Unanswered
NoemieL
asked this question in
Questions / Documentation
Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
I dont like to comment on user-specific analyses. That being said, I would imagine that this is a problem of the peaks being used for the different analyses. I would assume that you did differential testing, found some peaks, and looked at motif enrichment within that peak subset. But then you did the footprinting off of all peaks? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
I am comparing 2 groups of cells (with translocation (Blue)vs. without (Red)). I identified the motifs specific to the translocation group and looked for positive TFs. I identified TCF4 as the top motif in this group as well as being correlated with the gene expression (integrated scRNAseq). However, when I looked at the footprint of TCF4, I was expecting to see a significant difference between the two groups with the translocation group in blue having an higher accessibility around the motif but this is not the case. Could you please help me to understand these results? Thanks
Motif enriched in the translocation group
in blue are the TF identified in the translocation group and in red in the non translocation group. The correlation was performed using only the translocation-group cells.
TCF4 footprinting with different distance to motif centre
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions