the annotation of the macs2 called peaks, Cell_type information #1816
ZunpengLiu
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments
-
One solution in my mind is go back to the generated rds files for each group in PeakCalls folder. And, then do some overlap analysis based on these files. Do you think that is reasonable? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
If I'm understanding your question correctly, then this has been answered previously. for ex #1546 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello,
Thanks for developing and managing the fantastic software. It is very helpful!
I am calling the peaks for each cell type by macs2 following the manual https://www.archrproject.com/bookdown/calling-peaks-w-macs2.html.
I export the peakSet using
getPeakSet(proj)
function. And, I found that these peaks for all groups/cell types are not shared between groups/cell types.Yes, I do see your explanation about these "However, these annotations do not inherently mean that the given peak was only called in that group, rather that the annotated group had the highest normalized significance for that peak call." However, in some conditions, we actually want to compare all of the called/identified peaks among different cell types, for example the overlap/Jaccard analysis.
So, how can we get some more information about the detailed annotation for these identified/merged union peaks, not only the annotation for the group with highest significance. For example, for the Cell_type column , how can we get more groups, A, B, C, et al for the merged union peaks, or a binary column for each group to show whether the peak is exist in this specific group.
Thanks!
Zunpeng
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions