Using addIterativeLSI with a PeakMatrix #795
Unanswered
skwalker
asked this question in
Questions / Documentation
Replies: 1 comment 15 replies
-
I dont see a clear reason for how this would happen. Could you show some of the code that you have used? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
15 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi!
Thanks for building such a great platform for analyzing scATAC-seq data ! I've been playing around with using different values for
ceiling
when runningaddPeakMatrix
and seeing how they change the lower dimensionality space by runningaddIterativeLSI
withuseMatrix = "PeakMatrix"
. I've found that changing the value forceiling
, while it certainly changes the values in the Peak Matrix, does not seem to affect the lower dimensionality space; for example, my UMAP plots are exactly the same when I useceiling=1
andceiling=30
, and in addition, the SVD matrix generated from the reduced dimensions is also unchanged. It seems a little bizarre to me that this wouldn't change anything since the Peak Matrix is quite different in these two situations. Do you have any idea of why updating the PeakMatrix like this wouldn't actually change the lower dimensionality space ? It is definitely using the PeakMatrix, right?Thanks,
Sarah
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions