resolution option in addIterativeLSI() and addClusters() #946
-
Could someone explain how the resolution option in addIterativeLSI() and addClusters() are different? I think the resolution in addClusters() directly affects the number of clusters, but I'm unsure the effect that addIterativeLSI's resolution has on the number of clusters. Below are the example uses of those two functions: projHeme2 <- addIterativeLSI( projHeme2 <- addClusters( How does using 0.2 in addIterativeLSI and 0.8 in addCluster affect the clustering results? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
Might be helpful to review how Iterative LSI works in ArchR: There is a clustering step that helps in identifying variable features but those clusters are not stored, they are just used during the LSI process. Then you go an add clusters based on your final dim reduction. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Might be helpful to review how Iterative LSI works in ArchR:
https://www.archrproject.com/bookdown/iterative-latent-semantic-indexing-lsi.html
There is a clustering step that helps in identifying variable features but those clusters are not stored, they are just used during the LSI process. Then you go an add clusters based on your final dim reduction.